Saturday 30 April 2011

Grand Pan African Sit-in



BIG SIT-IN PAN

Ivorians, dear patriots and African friends
On 11 May, it will be a month that the Head of State, His Excellency Mr Laurent Gbagbo and with him the entire Cote d'Ivoire was victim of coup d'etat of France.
At a time when we send you this message we have no news of him nor all the other dignitaries and patriots arrested by the imperialists in the process.
Our duty is to keep the flame of the struggle for the unconditional release of our leader and all political prisoners on the one hand and the return of exiles other.
That is why the Committee of the UK Ivorians Patriots invites you to:

Grand Pan African Sit-in
Date: Saturday, May 14, 2011
Location: House of Parliament London
Westminster SW1A 0AA Station
Contacts: 07533803231-07883398146-079008120578
Time: 11.00 to 15.00 H
Dress Code: All White in as usual

Patriots and dear Pan-Africanists, the success of this event is down to us all. To do this you are personally requested to circulate this message to your network (Facebook, e-mail, phone, twitter ...) and take all appropriate measures to ensure your participation.
Ivory Coast is calling us, Africa is calling us now
To the patriots of the United Kingdom

MADE Gueu
Speaker

UN WATCH IVORY COAST: Blood Chocolate Soon in Stores worldwide

UN WATCH IVORY COAST: Blood Chocolate Soon in Stores worldwide: "Blood Chocolate Soon in US Stores US- and France-backed Alassane Ouattara is determined to impose new ownership of cocoa and coffee planta..."

Blood Chocolate Soon in Stores worldwide



Blood Chocolate Soon in US Stores

US- and France-backed Alassane Ouattara is determined to impose new ownership of cocoa and coffee plantations. Current farmers were all killed, including children and women in their villages that were all burned down, in their cocoa and coffee plantations and in the bushes. The survivors, most of whom found refuge in neighboring Liberia and in places like the Duekoue Catholic church, are not only afraid of being killed by pro-Ouattara rebels and terrorists if they return, they have been replaced by Malinke and foreign national occupants on their lands and properties.
Ndzana Seme

BALTIMORE 04/19/2011 – There is a chance that the Hershey chocolate bar, the Donkin Donut chocolate glaze or the favored chocolate milk that any US kid or customer would enjoy within the next weeks will be tainted with human blood.
It is highly likely that a cocoa product that any consumer will purchase soon on the US market was grown, harvested and treated by a farmer who was killed during the widespread massacres that are unfolding in Cote d’Ivoire (the official name for Ivory Coast) since late March until this day.
A third of the world’s cocoa is produced in Cote d’Ivoire. Cocoa is the raw bean that yields chocolate once processed.
In the Catholic mission of the Western town of Duekoue where she shares a tiny space with 27 400 fellow Guere ethnic group members all displaced from their cocoa producing lands, 41 years old Bah Bonao Sidonie told IRIN reporter that three of her brothers were all killed at Carrefour neighborhood “when soldiers [pro-Ouattara rebel forces] came.”
The larger, half-million We ethnic group, which includes the Wobe and the Guere, have always lived in the area including the towns of Duekoue, Guiglo, Toulepleu, Blolequen, Bangolo, Kuibli and Facobly, since distant times; for there is no known historical We migration.
The We people have always been the area’s land owners going as far back as before the arrival of the French colonizer. They are most of all known as the owners of cocoa and coffee plantations.
In Duekoue, the Guere people own most cocoa and coffee plantations. But as it is common practice in the whole country since the 1960’s, these farmers use foreign labor as plantation workers.
Those cocoa and coffee plantation workers come from foreign areas, including internal Baoule people, but also foreign Malinke (Dioula-speaking) and other people from Burkina Faso, Mali, Guinea and other countries.
Back in 1990, former French puppet dictator and greatest cocoa farmer Felix Houphouet Boigny appointed Burkina Faso national Alassane Dramane Ouattara Prime Minister.
Since then, above all because Boigny successor Henri Konan Bedie had denied Ouattara any opportunity to run for president as he lacked of “ivoirité” (being Ivory Coast national), relationship between Malinke workers and their Guere employers have, like in other farming areas of the country, shifted from job conditions disputes to land ownership disputes.
This situation was further poisoned since 2002 when Ouattara-funded and France-organized rebellion of Northern (mostly Malinke) ex-convicts and militaries attempted a coup to overthrow Laurent Gbagbo, who was then democratically elected less than two years earlier.
The situation was further inflamed after France positioned its Licorne troops as a buffer zone and drafted UN resolutions to add ONUCI troops in order to maintain a 9-year long separation of Cote d’Ivoire between rebel-held North and government-controlled South.
Because the Guere people found themselves in the separation area and because they are Laurent Gbagbo supporters, they have since then been subjected to Malinke and rebel attacks aimed at taking their lands by force.
During the 9-year period of negotiations during which France, after they had destroyed government’s air military capabilities, brought the government to consider the rebels as equal partners, tensions between farmers and their foreign workers were aggravated beyond all proportions.
In November 28, 2010, the presidential runoff election opposed rebel-supported Alassane Ouattara (article 42 of the Constitution was exceptionally changed to allow him to run) to incumbent President Laurent Gbagbo.
Laurent Gbagbo was proclaimed the election winner with 51% of votes by the Constitutional Council (the country’s Supreme Court on election matters). The court also nullified election results in several Northern zones where armed rebels had terrorized, killed, burned houses, tortured and raped voters, and threatened election observers and officials.
But Alassane Ouattara, along with his supporters, including the ONUCI chief who certified the fictitious provisional results read by pro-Ouattara CEI (Independent Electoral Commission) President, French President Nicolas Sarkozy, US President Barrack Obama and his crowd of following leaders all rejected the Constitutional Council’s proclaimed results.
This is like foreign leaders had rejected the Supreme Court decision to recount votes in Florida during the 2000 Bush-Gore election result dispute. Obviously, George W Bush’s government would have rejected in the strongest terms such foreign interference in US affairs. Which is exactly what President Laurent Gbagbo did, in response to the “international community”’s pressure.
Yet by imposing CEI President’s results (even though CEI did not actually reach any results because of lack of the required consensus) and pressing President Gbagbo to step down otherwise he would bear serious consequences, while Cote d’Ivoire’s Head of State rejected those external claims and stayed in power to preserve the country’s Constitution and sovereignty, the crisis Cote d’Ivoire was created, fueled and exacerbated.
Clashes erupted in the Duekoue and other Western areas between the We people supported by pro-Gbagbo local “Patriot Youth” and the Malinke and Baoule people supported by the rebels. Tens of people died.
Among the sanctions pushed forth by Nicolas Sarkozy and Barrack Obama to starve the government and bring Gbagbo to step down was the ban on Cote d’Ivoire cocoa exportations.
Côte d’Ivoire is the world’s largest cocoa bean producer, with 1.6 million metric tones in 2010. The country accounts for 44 percent of global cocoa production.
U.S. imports of cocoa beans were about $660 million in 2008, 60 percent of which were from Cote d’Ivoire (Source: U.S. Food Import Patterns, 1998-2007 / FAU-125).
U.S. imports of cocoa powder and other cocoa products (mainly chocolates), which undergo further value-added processing compared with cocoa butter, accounted for $2.6 billion in 2008.
Those imports were primarily from Netherlands (mainly from Nestle, the first world’s Cote d’Ivoire cocoa importer) and Mexico who accounted both for over 60 percent of cocoa powder imports to the United State (Source: U.S. Food Import Patterns, 1998-2007 / FAU-125).
These numbers show that any ban on Cote d’Ivoire cocoa beans and products hits US cocoa processing, transportation and trade businesses seriously, with major damages.
Because Laurent Gbagbo resisted the ban by taking the decision to nationalize the country’s cocoa sector, with the State purchasing all cocoa beans from framers and selling them to any companies of its choosing, international cocoa prices rose sharply.
Last January, world traders paid US$3 394.56 per tone compared to US$2 910.31 per tone in November 2010 when Ivorians went to the polls.
Cargill, one of the biggest global trad­ing companies of cocoa, made an announcement that it was suspending cocoa purchases from Cote d’Ivoire.
Yet, the situation was so tense that American company and main cocoa importer, Archer Daniels Midland (ADM), indirectly stated that it may not comply with the trade ban, according to a World Bank paper.
ADM, which maintains capabilities of 18 cocoa bean processing plants treating about 3,000 metric tones each year in the US, had actually no choice but to purchase cocoa in the expanding Cote d’Ivoire black market, which has channels in Burkina Faso and Ghana (Source: 2010 ADM 10-K)Because the ban was unbearable for US cocoa product companies as they are pressured by the demand from their world’s first chocolate consuming country, those set as a limit for all actors to solve the power crisis issue the date of March 31, 2011. After such date, they would pay to Laurent Gbagbo’s government all duties and taxes owed it for the already purchased cocoa stocked on the ports of Abidjan and San Pedro.
Therefore, it came to no surprise that on March 27, the rebels, terrorists and mercenaries behind Alassane Ouattara, with the support of French Licorne troops and ONUCI troops, advanced and attacked government army positions along the buffer line.
The national army refused to fight and withdrew instead all its troops and concentrated them only to defend Abidjan.
Unfortunately, when Ouattara’s armed groups took control of Duekoue and the other towns in the We area, they massacred over 800 people only between March 27 and March 28, most of whom were Guere people in what is nothing but genocide.
The farmers were all killed, including children and women in their villages that were all burned down, in their cocoa and coffee plantations and in the bushes.
The same pattern of massacres is noticed in all areas that fell under pro-Ouattara armed groups, including in Abidjan where, after they were stopped by Gbagbo’s republican guard they went into a spree of mass killings, arson, torture and rape of Gbagbo supporters, and of looting and robbery of companies and stores.
As the bodies continue to being discovered and removed in the areas of massacres by non profit organizations, the estimated count of the massacres may exceed 2 000 in the Duekoue and other Western We areas alone.
The survivors, most of whom found refuge in neighboring Liberia (the We people’s pre-colonial territory extends to that country) and in places like the Duekoue Catholic church, are not only afraid of being killed by the pro-Ouattara rebels and terrorists now re-baptized Republican Forces if they return, they have been replaced by Malinke and foreign national occupants on their lands and properties.
Since the French and Alassane Ouattara have always been pushing for citizenship reforms and for the land reform, it looks like they did not wait until they are established in power before they drive Ivorian farmers out of their cocoa and coffee producing lands by the force of massacres and genocide.
Current Ouattara’s Prime Minister Guillaume Soro, former Gbagbo’s French-imposed Prime Minister in charge of elections, registered cores of foreigners to vote during last presidential election.
Alassane Ouattara was married to Jewish French national Dominique Nouvian in 1990 by a mayor of Neuilly named Nicolas Sarkozy, who is of Hungarian, Jewish origins. Since then, the Ouattara’s and Sarkozy are very close friends.
Georges Soros, a Jewish US billionaire, lent his private jet to Alassane Ouattara during his last presidential campaign. Soros does not like Laurent Gbagbo, a socialist who is not likely to make of Cote d’Ivoire an “open society.”
Georges Soros is the main source of funding for the Democratic Party, which placed both Obama and Bill Clinton into the White House, with the potential of making Hillary Clinton the first female US President.
For a whole week before they captured Laurent Gbagbo from his hunker, Nicolas Saykozy-ordered French special forces had bombed (with Licorne and ONUCI helicopters and tanks) and destroyed all national army’s military camps and equipments, the presidential residence and palace, the RTI national television and radio that was debunking “international community” lies, the TCI telecommunication building, and many other residential locations, with cores of civilians killed, especially among those who were determined to maintain a human shield around their President’s residence.
If Alassane Ouattara were maintained as Cote d’Ivoire President as it is being settled now with Sarkozy and Obama support, it is unthinkable that the massacred and dispossessed WE people of Duekoue and the other (former) land owners in the country will accept the new, imposed “land reform.” And blood is about to taint Cote d’Ivoire cocoa for the years to come…

Friday 29 April 2011

UN WATCH IVORY COAST: /The_Lightening_Rod_President

UN WATCH IVORY COAST: /The_Lightening_Rod_President: "The Lightning Rod President Ivory Coast’s new 'president' has made many enemies over the years. Can he bring peace? BY DANIEL BALINT-KURTI ..."

/The_Lightening_Rod_President


The Lightning Rod President

Ivory Coast’s new "president" has made many enemies over the years. Can he bring peace?

BY DANIEL BALINT-KURTI | APRIL 29, 2011

"Terrorist." "Foreigner." "Vampire." Alassane Dramane Ouattara has been a magnet for some scathing insults over the past 20 years in Ivory Coast, the West African country of which he has just become president after a four-month conflict with his rival, Laurent Gbagbo. Despite the animosity against him, stoked for years by successive regimes, Ouattara won last November's presidential election fair and square. But taking power wasn't so easy. Gbagbo, the incumbent, refused to step down, claiming he had actually been the victor. It took an all-out military assault on the commercial capital Abidjan -- aided by French and U.N. troops -- to get Gbagbo out. Even then, the outgoing president refused to concede defeat, leaving Ouattara to try to govern and reconcile a country where only just over half the people voted for him.
Ivory Coast is in bad shape. Civil servants are owed weeks of salaries, banks have been ransacked, and migrants, vital to the country's economy, have fled in droves. With his record as a technocrat and economic reformer, the new president has the skills and background to nurture the country back to health. But whether he has the political chops is another question altogether. Ouattara's enemies are still seething over the violence committed by his armed supporters and over his backing from France, the much-hated former colonial master. A polarizing figure, Ouattara's biggest obstacle in the coming months may be himself.
How did Ouattara, a soft-spoken man who was once among the top officials at the International Monetary Fund (IMF), come to be such a divisive figure? The short answer is that rival politicians have long feared Ouattara's popularity, and for years they have done all in their power to counter it with rumors, accusations, and often outright lies -- all part of an effort to ensure he would not assume the presidency. Writing in her memoirs, for example, Gbagbo's wife Simone said of Ouattara, "I arrived at the conviction that this man was dangerous, without scruples, without faith or law.... Alassane Ouattara turned out to be a real scourge for our country."
Ouattara arrived on the political scene in April 1990, when Ivory Coast's founding father and president, Félix Houphouët-Boigny, appointed him as economic czar. Houphouët had already been in power for three decades, running a dictatorship that was mostly benevolent. But during his rule, Ivory Coast behaved as if it were banking on a never-ending economic boom, borrowing lavishly from France, the IMF, and the World Bank to invest in infrastructure and private enterprises. Thanks to a successful agricultural sector, notably including the world's largest cocoa harvest, Ivory Coast's economy grew by 7.5 percent a year on average from 1960 to 1980, putting it among the 15 fastest-growing economies in the world. By the end of this period, however, cocoa prices were falling and the so-called Ivorian miracle began to peter out. In May 1987, the country suspended repayment of its $13.5 billion foreign debt. Houphouët was facing the deepest crisis of his rule.
In dire need of economic help, Houphouët saw Ouattara, then the governor of the Central Bank of West African States, as just the man for the job. Without dropping his post as Central Bank governor, Ouattara, then 48 and a father of two by his American ex-wife, leapt at the chance to enter government.
Installed in his top-floor, air-conditioned office in an ultra-modern skyscraper, Ouattara drew up a set of reforms. The measures, which became known as "the Ouattara plan," were a gentler version of the reforms that had been pushed by the IMF and the World Bank. He ruled out wage cuts after a wave of protests in the preceding months. Instead, Ouattara sought to make savings by making the rich pay their taxes and ending widespread customs fraud. He told civil servants to follow his example by turning up for work at 7:30 a.m. and foregoing the usual three-hour lunch break, taking instead just one hour. He aimed to cut state spending by a quarter, boost tax collection by a third, and erase a $768 million budget deficit. His strategy was successful in macroeconomic terms. But it divided Ivorians, earning him many domestic enemies even as he was being lauded abroad.

UN WATCH IVORY COAST: What the World Got Wrong in Côte D'Ivoire Why is t...

UN WATCH IVORY COAST: What the World Got Wrong in Côte D'Ivoire Why is t...: "What the World Got Wrong in Côte D'Ivoire Why is the United Nations entrenching former colonial powers on our continent? Africans can and s..."

What the World Got Wrong in Côte D'Ivoire Why is the United Nations entrenching former colonial powers on our continent? Africans can and should take the lead in resolving their own disputes. BY THABO MBEKI | APRIL 29, 2011 While obliged to respect its peacekeeping mandate, which included keeping the belligerent forces apart, UNOCI did nothing to stop the advance of the Forces Nouvelles from the north to the south, including and up to Abidjan. Nor did UNOCI or the French Licorne forces, as mandated by the United Nations, act to protect civilians in the area of Duékoué, where, evidently, the most concentrated murder of civilians took place! This recalls the United Nations's failure to end the more catastrophic murder and abuse of civilians in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo! The Ivorian reality points to a number of incontrovertible conclusions. The agreed conditions for the holding of democratic elections in Côte d'Ivoire were not created. Despite strong allegations of electoral fraud, the international community decided against conducting any verification of the process and the announced results. This left unanswered the vitally important question of who actually had won the elections, which Ouattara might have done. The United Nations elected to abandon its neutrality as a peacemaker, deciding to be a partisan belligerent in the Ivorian conflict. France used its privileged place in the Security Council to position itself to play an important role in determining the future of Côte d'Ivoire, its former colony in which, inter alia, it has significant economic interests. It joined the United Nations to ensure that Ouattara emerged as the victor in the Ivorian conflict. This addressed the national interests of France, consistent with its Françafrique policies, which aim to perpetuate a particular relationship with its former African colonies. This is in keeping with remarks made by former French President François Mitterand when he said, "Without Africa, France will have no history in the 21st century," which former French foreign minister Jacques Godfrain confirmed when he said: "A little country [France], with a small amount of strength, we can move a planet because [of our]...relations with 15 or 20 African countries..." The AU is also not without blame, as it failed to assert itself to persuade everybody to work to achieve reconciliation among the Ivorians, and therefore durable peace. Tragically, the outcome that has been achieved in Côte d'Ivoire further entrenches the endemic conflict in this country. This is because it has placed in the exclusive hands of the failed rebellion of 2002 the ability to determine the future of the country, whereas the objective situation dictated and dictates that the people of Côte d'Ivoire should engage one another as equals to determine their shared destiny. During the decade he served as president of Côte d'Ivoire, Gbagbo had no possibility to act on his own to reunify the country and achieve reconciliation among its diverse people, despite the existence of negotiated agreements in this regard. As he serves as president of the country, Ouattara will not succeed to realise these objectives, acting on his own, outside the context of honest agreement with the sections of the Ivorian population represented by Gbagbo. What was to come was foreseen by the then U.S. ambassador in Côte d'Ivoire, Wanda L. Nesbitt. In July 2009, she advised the U.S. government: "It now appears that the Ouaga IV agreement, [the fourth agreement to the Ouagadougou Political Agreement which prescribed that disarmament should precede the elections], is fundamentally an agreement between Blaise Compaore [President of Burkina Faso] and Laurent Gbagbo to share control of the north until after the presidential election, despite the fact that the text calls for the Forces Nouvelles to return control of the north to the government and complete disarmament two months before the election... "But the 5,000 Forces Nouvelles soldiers who are to be "disarmed" and regrouped into barracks in four key cities in the north and west until a new national army is created, represent a serious military capability that the FAFN [Forces Nouvelles] intends to keep well-trained and in reserve until after the election. The hand-over of administrative power from the FAFN to civilian government authorities is a pre-requisite for elections but, as travelers to the north (including Embassy personnel) confirm: the FAFN retain de-facto control of the region especially when it comes to finances.


What the World Got Wrong in Côte D'Ivoire

Why is the United Nations entrenching former colonial powers on our continent? Africans can and should take the lead in resolving their own disputes.

BY THABO MBEKI | APRIL 29, 2011

While obliged to respect its peacekeeping mandate, which included keeping the belligerent forces apart, UNOCI did nothing to stop the advance of the Forces Nouvelles from the north to the south, including and up to Abidjan. Nor did UNOCI or the French Licorne forces, as mandated by the United Nations, act to protect civilians in the area of Duékoué, where, evidently, the most concentrated murder of civilians took place! This recalls the United Nations's failure to end the more catastrophic murder and abuse of civilians in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo!
The Ivorian reality points to a number of incontrovertible conclusions.
The agreed conditions for the holding of democratic elections in Côte d'Ivoire were not created. Despite strong allegations of electoral fraud, the international community decided against conducting any verification of the process and the announced results. This left unanswered the vitally important question of who actually had won the elections, which Ouattara might have done.
The United Nations elected to abandon its neutrality as a peacemaker, deciding to be a partisan belligerent in the Ivorian conflict.
France used its privileged place in the Security Council to position itself to play an important role in determining the future of Côte d'Ivoire, its former colony in which, inter alia, it has significant economic interests. It joined the United Nations to ensure that Ouattara emerged as the victor in the Ivorian conflict.
This addressed the national interests of France, consistent with its Françafrique policies, which aim to perpetuate a particular relationship with its former African colonies. This is in keeping with remarks made by former French President François Mitterand when he said, "Without Africa, France will have no history in the 21st century," which former French foreign minister Jacques Godfrain confirmed when he said: "A little country [France], with a small amount of strength, we can move a planet because [of our]...relations with 15 or 20 African countries..."
The AU is also not without blame, as it failed to assert itself to persuade everybody to work to achieve reconciliation among the Ivorians, and therefore durable peace. Tragically, the outcome that has been achieved in Côte d'Ivoire further entrenches the endemic conflict in this country. This is because it has placed in the exclusive hands of the failed rebellion of 2002 the ability to determine the future of the country, whereas the objective situation dictated and dictates that the people of Côte d'Ivoire should engage one another as equals to determine their shared destiny.
During the decade he served as president of Côte d'Ivoire, Gbagbo had no possibility to act on his own to reunify the country and achieve reconciliation among its diverse people, despite the existence of negotiated agreements in this regard. As he serves as president of the country, Ouattara will not succeed to realise these objectives, acting on his own, outside the context of honest agreement with the sections of the Ivorian population represented by Gbagbo.
What was to come was foreseen by the then U.S. ambassador in Côte d'Ivoire, Wanda L. Nesbitt. In July 2009, she advised the U.S. government:
"It now appears that the Ouaga IV agreement, [the fourth agreement to the Ouagadougou Political Agreement which prescribed that disarmament should precede the elections], is fundamentally an agreement between Blaise Compaore [President of Burkina Faso] and Laurent Gbagbo to share control of the north until after the presidential election, despite the fact that the text calls for the Forces Nouvelles to return control of the north to the government and complete disarmament two months before the election...
"But the 5,000 Forces Nouvelles soldiers who are to be "disarmed" and regrouped into barracks in four key cities in the north and west until a new national army is created, represent a serious military capability that the FAFN [Forces Nouvelles] intends to keep well-trained and in reserveuntil after the election. The hand-over of administrative power from the FAFN to civilian government authorities is a pre-requisite for elections but, as travelers to the north (including Embassy personnel) confirm: the FAFN retain de-facto control of the region especially when it comes to finances.

UN WATCH IVORY COAST: La Côte-d'Ivoire marque deux semaines sans un gouv...

UN WATCH IVORY COAST: La Côte-d'Ivoire marque deux semaines sans un gouv...: "La Côte-d'Ivoire marque deux semaines sans un gouvernement légitime et un pouvoir légal: «En route pour une république bananière'! je..."

La Côte-d'Ivoire marque deux semaines sans un gouvernement légitime et un pouvoir légal:


La Côte-d'Ivoire marque deux semaines sans un gouvernement légitime et un pouvoir légal: «En route pour une république bananière"! 
   
jeu, 28 avr. 2011 - Catégorie 08h42: Actualités
Alassane Ouattara, chef de la  République Bananière de Côte d'Ivoire. 
Le 28 avril 2011 IvoireBusiness nominale - Tout d'abord, nous tenons  absolument a tout clarifier ''en ce qui  concerne le contexte politique qui préoccupe  la "Côte d'Ivoire", parce que le gouvernement que l'on appelle  celui d' "Alassane Ouattara" n'est pas légitime, et le pouvoir qui est soit disant lui  revenir de droit  non plus selon la Constitution ivoirienne! Dans la même tendance, le sociologue américain "Talcott Parsons" fait valoir que le pouvoir politique est la capacité d'un gouvernement de s'appuyer sur les engagements de ses citoyens de manière à atteindre des objectifs collectifs comme le droit et l'ordre, protection contre les attaques et la croissance économique. Le plus puissant que le gouvernement, plus efficace, il serait à la réalisation des objectifs de toute la communauté. Pour le sociologue américain "Parsons", donc le pouvoir dans la politique n'était pas seulement une question d'un groupe social ou un parti politique se bousculent avec les autres pour gagner le contrôle de l'Etat ... Au contraire, le pouvoir est l'outil efficace qui a permis à des règles pour atteindre les objectifs de la société. Dans la tourmente ivoirienne actuelle, la controverse réside dans la réalité crucial que la violence, le pillage, les tueries effectué par  les sanguinaires rebelles de l'Afrique de l'Ouest et de mercenaires d'"Alassane Ouattara" , sont sans aucun doute une des formes les plus honteux de la du pouvoir dans le nouveau millénaire. Mais la fréquence des guerres, à la fois entre les nations  et en leur sein, témoigne de son importance dans l'histoire. Mais comme l'histoire, c'est plus que la guerre, tant de pouvoir implique plus que la force! Par conséquent, l'histoire peut enregistrer que les vainqueurs de "de la 2e guerre mondiale" avait créé l'Organisation des Nations Unies et son Conseil de sécurité pour contrôler le monde entier politiquement, affectant les pays africains post coloniaux dans leur ensemble. Par exemple, le soutien international d "Alassane Ouattara" lors de la présidentielle ivoirienne le 28 novembre 2010 en a été une trompette significatif de l'occident  que "Laurent Gbagbo" a été l'ennemi commun de l'occident ! À l'heure actuelle, en "Côte d'Ivoire", nous sommes sur la bonne voie pour une d'un accident légales et constitutionnelles "Gbagbo" demeure le président légitime de la «Côte d'Ivoire", selon la Constitution ivoirienne. D'autre part, la nation ivoirienne est encore à pied à travers le désert, étant au bord d'un chemin coupe-feu malgré l'apparente cesser le feu dans le pays. Pendant ce temps, "Alassane Ouatara de" rebelles et des mercenaires Afrique de l'Ouest sont en répondant à une forte résistance dans deux principaux quartiers de la capitale économique, notamment dans le quartier de "Yopougon" où la plupart des patriotes ivoiriens ne sont pas prêts d'abandonner! En réalité, le chemin de la paix et la réconciliation dans la "Côte d'Ivoire" semble être un objectif qui ne pourrait être atteint aussi longtemps que le pays reste comme un no man's land et une république bananière, en vertu de la règle de la sanglante rébellion Afrique de l'Ouest et mercenaires de «Alassane Ouattara»!Incontestablement, une justice internationale a pour enquêter sur la violation des droits humains depuis le début de la rébellion du Nord de "(Septembre 2002) jusqu'à aujourd'hui où presque (1000 personnes) ont péri dans des conditions odieuses dans la ville de" Duekoué »dans l'ouest de la" CÔTE-D'IVOIRE ", également dans les quartiiers de la  capitale économique" Abidjan "après les raids aériens militaires françaises permanentes où plus de (1000) patriotes non armés utilisés comme boucliers humains ont perdu la vie! Par conséquent, les enquêtes préliminaires et les crimes allégués effectué par le parrain de la rébellion ivoirienne, "Allasane Ouattara" doit commencer sous le contrôle d'une justice internationale de façon à ne rien dire que, toute la vérité car.la paix est  enjeu et  il ne  faut jamais oublier que, celui qui vit par l'épée, périra par l'épée!Le temps nous dira .. 
(Yves T Bouazo) 

UN WATCH IVORY COAST: Refugees tell of Ivory Coast violence after fleein...

UN WATCH IVORY COAST: Refugees tell of Ivory Coast violence after fleein...: "As the fighting to install Alassane Ouattara as president of Ivory Coast continues in Abidjan, stories are emerging of death and chaos as r..."

Refugees tell of Ivory Coast violence after fleeing to Liberia - video


As the fighting to install Alassane Ouattara as president of Ivory Coast continues in Abidjan, stories are emerging of death and chaos as rebel forces have moved towards Abidjan



AN END TO FRENCH NEO-COLONIALISM IN AFRICA AND FREEDOM FOR LAURENT KOUDOU GBAGBO

http://www.petitionbuzz.com/petitions/stopponslefranccfa


On the 11th of April 2011, President Laurent Koudou Gbagbo of The Ivory Coast the elected and constitutionally recognized President was illegally and unconstitutionally deposed and detained in a French/United Nation's led palace coup d'état which imposed on The Ivory Coast the chosen candidate of Western imperialists; Mr Alassane Dramane Ouattara.

Till date there has been no information on his and his entourage's whereabouts, his wife First Lady Simone Gbagbo was brutally tortured and had meted out to her person the most degrading acts of humiliation that included having her hair ripped out from the roots. Mr Désire Tagro former Interior Minister of President Gbagbo has been murdered alongside hundreds of President Gbagbo's supporters. A simple recount of the votes as demanded by President Gbagbo and his camp could have averted all the bloodshed but france, the UN and the "International community" refused because they knew that their electoral fraud and masquerade would have been discovered and their candidate; Ouattara disqualified.!!!

We call on the civilized and right thinking people of the world to join us in saying NO to the French and United Nations' barbaric, brutal, unconstitutional and illegal actions in The Ivory Coast which killed thousands of citizens and destroyed the Presidential palace of The Ivory Coast.

Dialogue & Civilized Discourse as opposed to Savagery & Brute Force.

FREE PRESIDENT LAURENT KOUDOU GBAGBO OF THE IVORY COAST NOW.!!!