Although the Constitution of Côte d'Ivoire provides no appeal against decisions of the Constitutional Council, supporters of Alassane Ouattara and its Western allies argue that the president of this council was appointed by Laurent Gbagbo. Is this a reason to dismiss out of hand the judges' decision? In Canada, for example, the Supreme Court judges are appointed by the Prime Minister. Quebec he asked UN peacekeepers to bomb Ottawa when the Supreme Court of Canada struck down several provisions of the Charter of the French language?
The supporters of Alassane Ouattara and its Western allies also argue that, under Article 64 of the Electoral Code, the Constitutional Council had a duty to order the resumption of elections within 45 days if it found serious irregularities. However, this argument amounts to giving more power to the IEC at the Constitutional Council and to deny it its function as supreme judge in matters of law enforcement. The Election Code is a law of Côte d'Ivoire, which must be interpreted in light of the Constitution and the rest of the country's legal framework.
Moreover, the same causes produce the same effects, a vote honest in areas under rebel control would have been difficult without disarmament. Given the circumstances, the highest judicial authority had the right to make the decision she felt in the national interest.
Côte d'Ivoire is a sovereign state with democratic institutions, it does not return to the international community, but the Ivorian population to choose its own chairman. In Canada, we accept that the "international community" declares the winner of the elections and enormous pressures to ensure that Canadians accept this choice? Electoral disputes are common in the world. Each time we let the judicial and administrative authorities of the country's resolve. Why do we want things to be different in Côte d'Ivoire? Because the population is black?
To add insult to injury, when the African Union has formed an expert committee to look into the matter, the committee did not discuss the merits of the question, ie, said electoral documents. He had merely to ask the various stakeholders of record and relied on the results of Choi and shadow on a serious error of appreciation. The African Union is funded 80% by the European Union, it is populated by liars who are on the same payroll as the UN liars. Here is an excerpt from the reply of the Gbagbo government report of the expert committee, replied that one could find the site of the Presidency of Côte d'Ivoire, but has since vanished Ouattara has closed the site . Fortunately, I had kept a copy:
"The African Union based [...] its decision on a serious error of assessment made by the panel, namely that the motion to quash the candidate Laurent Gbagbo included four (04) and not seven (07) departments. According to them, canceling seven instead of four, the Constitutional Council has gone beyond what was required. In truth, the Constitutional Council had before to cancel eight (08) departments: Bouake, Katiola Dabakala, BoundiaIi, Korogho Ferké, Beoumi, Sakassou. The Commission removed only seven (07): Bouake, Katiola Dabakala, Boundiali, Korhogo, Ferké, Seguela less than what was asked of him. This confusion appears to be a serious deliberate move to discredit the decision of the Constitutional Council and snatch the decision of the Panel members and CPS in support of Alassane Ouattara. "
Readers wishing to check in detail the information above may visit International Watch, where they will find documents relating to the second round of the presidential election, including a lot of evidence of massive fraud.
The lies to incriminate Gbagbo
We already knew the deleterious role of UN peacekeepers in Haiti false or the Democratic Republic of Congo, where, in summer 2010, for example, in the village of Luvungi, they let the executioners armed rape women and children for one week without intervention.
The supporters of Alassane Ouattara and its Western allies also argue that, under Article 64 of the Electoral Code, the Constitutional Council had a duty to order the resumption of elections within 45 days if it found serious irregularities. However, this argument amounts to giving more power to the IEC at the Constitutional Council and to deny it its function as supreme judge in matters of law enforcement. The Election Code is a law of Côte d'Ivoire, which must be interpreted in light of the Constitution and the rest of the country's legal framework.
Moreover, the same causes produce the same effects, a vote honest in areas under rebel control would have been difficult without disarmament. Given the circumstances, the highest judicial authority had the right to make the decision she felt in the national interest.
Côte d'Ivoire is a sovereign state with democratic institutions, it does not return to the international community, but the Ivorian population to choose its own chairman. In Canada, we accept that the "international community" declares the winner of the elections and enormous pressures to ensure that Canadians accept this choice? Electoral disputes are common in the world. Each time we let the judicial and administrative authorities of the country's resolve. Why do we want things to be different in Côte d'Ivoire? Because the population is black?
To add insult to injury, when the African Union has formed an expert committee to look into the matter, the committee did not discuss the merits of the question, ie, said electoral documents. He had merely to ask the various stakeholders of record and relied on the results of Choi and shadow on a serious error of appreciation. The African Union is funded 80% by the European Union, it is populated by liars who are on the same payroll as the UN liars. Here is an excerpt from the reply of the Gbagbo government report of the expert committee, replied that one could find the site of the Presidency of Côte d'Ivoire, but has since vanished Ouattara has closed the site . Fortunately, I had kept a copy:
"The African Union based [...] its decision on a serious error of assessment made by the panel, namely that the motion to quash the candidate Laurent Gbagbo included four (04) and not seven (07) departments. According to them, canceling seven instead of four, the Constitutional Council has gone beyond what was required. In truth, the Constitutional Council had before to cancel eight (08) departments: Bouake, Katiola Dabakala, BoundiaIi, Korogho Ferké, Beoumi, Sakassou. The Commission removed only seven (07): Bouake, Katiola Dabakala, Boundiali, Korhogo, Ferké, Seguela less than what was asked of him. This confusion appears to be a serious deliberate move to discredit the decision of the Constitutional Council and snatch the decision of the Panel members and CPS in support of Alassane Ouattara. "
Readers wishing to check in detail the information above may visit International Watch, where they will find documents relating to the second round of the presidential election, including a lot of evidence of massive fraud.
The lies to incriminate Gbagbo
We already knew the deleterious role of UN peacekeepers in Haiti false or the Democratic Republic of Congo, where, in summer 2010, for example, in the village of Luvungi, they let the executioners armed rape women and children for one week without intervention.
No comments:
Post a Comment