On behalf of foreigners? (The Chronicle of Joseph Marat)28 June 2012 @ 8:05
"The rural land consists of all land developed or not and whatever the nature of the development. It is a national heritage which any person or entity can access. However, only the State, public authorities and individuals are admitted to Ivorian be owners "and is stated in section 1 of the 1998 law on rural land. He sums up the spirit and all the political will to protect the heritage rural land against any prevarication and all conflicts that may arise between individuals competing for membership. Before his declination is on all the conditionalities of appropriation, the law is clear: the earth belongs to the state. An individual who wants to appropriate a parcel must be Ivorian after fulfilling certain conditions of course acquisition. This law which ends the legal heresy of Houphouetism who wanted the land belongs to he who exploit it, was voted unanimously by the member of the Parliament of 1998 legislature. It is this law that Alassane Ouattara government wants to change , in a kind of dubious precipitation to blame.
How? The main argument he advances against this law is that it stinks Ivoirité. A law passed by an Ivorian parliament should it have a smell other than 'ivorian ? Why should the Ivorian parliamentarians legislate laws of ECOWAS? Beyond these questions that reveal the absurdity of the current "government" approach, there is the whole issue of interests of the Ivorian people in its own territory. We understand, with these absurd claims for favoritism to non-nationals, under the pretext that the "Ivoriity£ was war made on the Ivorians just because they are Ivorians. Since the concept in question here, to divert a national law has no meaning other than "being Ivorian." In sum, Ouattara and his government want to say that this land law is not good because it is Ivorian. It was war on every regime since Bedie pretext that they are "ivoiritarians". The Marcoussis agreements have forced the Ivory Coast to naturalize more than three million Burkinabe to end the alleged Ivorians "xenophobia".
Today it hardly takes gloves for despoiling them of their lands. We originally thought that the destroyers of the concept of Ivorian identity were in good faith and attacked its vicious forms. We are forced to face the facts today that it is the very fact of being Ivorian which is threatened in any reform that seeks to start Alassane Ouattara. Because nowhere is there a leader who is so committed to fighting against the interests of his people for the benefit of another. A candidate for the presidency had said that his opponent was a candidate of the foreigners . Little did we think it could be literally true.
Joseph Marat
"The rural land consists of all land developed or not and whatever the nature of the development. It is a national heritage which any person or entity can access. However, only the State, public authorities and individuals are admitted to Ivorian be owners "and is stated in section 1 of the 1998 law on rural land. He sums up the spirit and all the political will to protect the heritage rural land against any prevarication and all conflicts that may arise between individuals competing for membership. Before his declination is on all the conditionalities of appropriation, the law is clear: the earth belongs to the state. An individual who wants to appropriate a parcel must be Ivorian after fulfilling certain conditions of course acquisition. This law which ends the legal heresy of Houphouetism who wanted the land belongs to he who exploit it, was voted unanimously by the member of the Parliament of 1998 legislature. It is this law that Alassane Ouattara government wants to change , in a kind of dubious precipitation to blame.
How? The main argument he advances against this law is that it stinks Ivoirité. A law passed by an Ivorian parliament should it have a smell other than 'ivorian ? Why should the Ivorian parliamentarians legislate laws of ECOWAS? Beyond these questions that reveal the absurdity of the current "government" approach, there is the whole issue of interests of the Ivorian people in its own territory. We understand, with these absurd claims for favoritism to non-nationals, under the pretext that the "Ivoriity£ was war made on the Ivorians just because they are Ivorians. Since the concept in question here, to divert a national law has no meaning other than "being Ivorian." In sum, Ouattara and his government want to say that this land law is not good because it is Ivorian. It was war on every regime since Bedie pretext that they are "ivoiritarians". The Marcoussis agreements have forced the Ivory Coast to naturalize more than three million Burkinabe to end the alleged Ivorians "xenophobia".
Today it hardly takes gloves for despoiling them of their lands. We originally thought that the destroyers of the concept of Ivorian identity were in good faith and attacked its vicious forms. We are forced to face the facts today that it is the very fact of being Ivorian which is threatened in any reform that seeks to start Alassane Ouattara. Because nowhere is there a leader who is so committed to fighting against the interests of his people for the benefit of another. A candidate for the presidency had said that his opponent was a candidate of the foreigners . Little did we think it could be literally true.
Joseph Marat
No comments:
Post a Comment