Please do something to stop the UN criminal activities

Mr Sadou Africain alerted us with the below message:
"A judge has just communicate to me  a very seriously.information  The UNOCI, which is supposed to protect the population has dropped yesterday tons of bombs on the town of Toulepleu, villages and forests have not been spared '. The inhabitants of Toulepleu region  fled in the bush or toward Blolequin UNOCI continues to hit the Ivorian population on behalf of Ouatara.
Information to be taken very seriously."
 We are taking this message so seriousely that we decided  to remain  the world about the UN mandate and some of the points which are not implemented exposing its institutionalized criminal activities .

Monitoring of the cessation of hostilities and movements of armed groups

• To observe and monitor the implementation of the joint declaration of the end of the war of 6 April 2005 and of the comprehensive ceasefire agreement of 3 May 2003, to prevent, within its capabilities and its areas of deployment, any hostile action, and to investigate violations of the ceasefire,
• To liaise with the National Armed Forces of Côte d’Ivoire (FANCI) and the military elements of the Forces Nouvelles in order to promote, in coordination with the French forces, the re-establishment of trust among all the Ivorian forces involved,
• To assist the Government of Côte d’Ivoire in monitoring the borders, with particular attention to the situation of Liberian refugees and to any cross-border movement of combatants,(Notice this is very often twisted by the UN in order to intervene on behalf to the dictatorial regime in internal domestic matter. And yet this clearly talking about Liberian combatants n ot Ivorian that's the reason why Ouattara prefers using the term "pro-Gbagbo Liberian mercenaries or militias" so the UN can be used in Ivorian internal affairs  )

And here's the main point of the  mandat which has never been implemented worsening the current conflictual situation :

Disarmament, demobilization, reintegration, repatriation and resettlement

• To assist the Government of Côte d’Ivoire in undertaking the regrouping of all the Ivorian forces involved and to assist in ensuring the security of their disarmament, cantonment and demobilization sites,
• To support the Government of Côte d’Ivoire, within UNOCI’s current capacities, in the implementation of the national programme for the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of combatants, including through logistical support, in particular for the preparation of cantonment sites, paying special attention to the specific needs of women and children,
• To ensure that the national programme for the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of combatants and that the voluntary repatriation and resettlement programme for foreign ex-combatants take into account the need for a coordinated regional approach,
• To secure, neutralize or destroy any weapons, ammunition or any other military materiel surrendered by the former combatants.

If we add to this the fact that the UN is

Non-use of force except in self-defence and defence of the mandate

UN peacekeeping operations are not an enforcement tool. However, they may use force at the tactical level, with the authorization of the Security Council, if acting in self-defence and defence of the mandate.
In certain volatile situations, the Security Council has given UN peacekeeping operations “robust” mandates authorizing them to “use all necessary means” to deter forceful attempts to disrupt the political process, protect civilians under imminent threat of physical attack, and/or assist the national authorities in maintaining law and order.
Although on the ground they may sometimes appear similar, robust peacekeeping should not be confused with peace enforcement, as envisaged under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter.

• Robust peacekeeping involves the use of force at the tactical level with the authorization of the Security Council and consent of the host nation and/or the main parties to the conflict.
• By contrast, peace enforcement does not require the consent of the main parties and may involve the use of military force at the strategic or international level, which is normally prohibited for Member States under Article 2(4) of the Charter, unless authorized by the Security Council.

A UN peacekeeping operation should only use force as a measure of last resort. It should always be calibrated in a precise, proportional and appropriate manner, within the principle of the minimum force necessary to achieve the desired effect, while sustaining consent for the mission and its mandate

Impartiality

Impartiality is crucial to maintaining the consent and cooperation of the main parties, but should not be confused with neutrality or inactivity. United Nations peacekeepers should be impartial in their dealings with the parties to the conflict, but not neutral in the execution of their mandate.
Just as a good referee is impartial, but will penalize infractions, so a peacekeeping operation should not condone actions by the parties that violate the undertakings of the peace process or the international norms and principles that a United Nations peacekeeping operation upholds.
Notwithstanding the need to establish and maintain good relations with the parties, a peacekeeping operation must scrupulously avoid activities that might compromise its image of impartiality. A mission should not shy away from a rigorous application of the principle of impartiality for fear of misinterpretation or retaliation.
 It's the failure to do so which has undermined the peacekeeping operation’s credibility and legitimacy as well th worsening of conflict in Ivory Coast , this was the reason why the legitimate government requested  a withdrawal for its presence . The request has not been respected either this led us to believe that we dealing with an institutionalized criminal activities by a so called international community.