The Ivory Coast is she still Ivorian?

Ivory Coast is known as the one of the countries world hosting the  largest number of foreigners on its territory. The official percentage of 26% is far below the reality for many of these people seeking asylum or make a fortune who have managed establish  and make themselves be accepted as Ivorian.One of them is now being imposed at the head of this country. How to understand for someone who was supposedly born on 01.01.1942 in a city of the V Baoulé( Dimbokro centre of Ivory Coast) that only in 1989, that is to say, almost to 50 years, that could  establish an Ivorian identity card?Remember it has always been allowed and encouraged to  young Ivorian  to establish a national identity card at the age of 18.It is therefore legitimated  to find in that foundation decisions of the Supreme Court that mentioned whenever in their conclusions the questionable nationality of this strange man. In addition, the acquisition of an apartment in Abidjan and award received which this man has benefited from the Ivorian authorities have been  under another nationality(Burkina Faso).Today, the acts that this man poses speak eloquently of his foreign nationality; starting with his bodyguard who is assigned to foreign armies as well as his advisers of all kinds.His fellow countrymen from Burkina Faso pushed the audacity to issue a document certifying that the man has never been a national of that country. What a blatant  lie!This is why all actions taken during his quest for power in this country of Eburnie are marked with the seal of identity confusion. Thus he refused as part of the public hearings, that people register  in their region of origin. In the same vein, his party, the RDR, has on this occasion demonstrated unprecedented violence against the population.This is why it imposed the resumption of the identification of Ivorians and this without the supervision of Ivorian official authorities. And it was an opportunity for a parody of  attribution unjustified of the CNI to all comers. That is why all his cronies took care to burn all the official records of the areas under their rule. What  a notorious incivility !And thus has been truncated for the candidate from abroad the Ivorian electoral file.  Many  were foreign neighbors who went to the polls to vote  for Ivorian Presidential  and the Presidentials of Mali, Burkina Faso and Guinea. What country is this where people have the opportunity to vote for Presidents of the Republic of countries they do not have the nationality?This is also why the shameful exploitation of ethnic catching up, you can find officials appointed by the "President of the Republic", whom have no Ivorian parents  and who  have never asked Ivorian nationality by naturalization. There's an observation since April 11, 2011 that the Ivorian nationality is no use to occupy a strategic position in the army or the administration. These are no longer in the hands of Ivory Coast. All strategic sectors and sovereignty are in the hands of France, Burkina Faso and the countries of the sub-region. France is experimenting in the knowledge of all, the disappearance of a state, one of its former colonies like the West did for the former Yugoslavia. It is transforming the Ivory Coast in a "no man's land."This  explains why Ivorians are dispossessed of their land to new settlers from the north(Burkina Faso).
Please check "Who is behind this master plan ?"
http://unwatchivorycoast.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/who-is-behind-this-master-plan.html

 So they kill with impunity Ivorians who dare claim any ownership. It is in this regard that citizens are murdered in western Ivory Coast. They occupy villas vacated by senior pro-Gbagbo(who flee the country to save their lives) tranfomed into hospices, clandestine concentration or tortures camps. They appropriate the beautiful villas abandoned temporarily by owners fleeing the barbarity of these rebel-criminal actions as macabre or worse than those who are described as terrorists to justify intervention and later a partition of Mali.All these expropriations, these distributions of awards for activism in the rebellion that has killed many Ivorians are accompanied by a harsh dictatorship against the opposition to bring forcibly to join these actions  of dispossession and destruction. So they put in prison brave FDS(Official legitimate Ivorian Security and Defense Forces)  men and recruits instead of foreign mercenaries in the Ivorian army.In the administration, are many (former) rebels, mostly foreigners, who are recruited without going through the formal examination or meeting the usual conditions imposed by the Ivorian government. This country  is therefore increasingly plundered by  French and West African foreigners . That is why, without adjudication 
, huge contracts are offered to French companies and Burkina Faso ,countries which are sponsors and executors of the killings perpetrated to remove Gbagbo from power. Thus, billions of FCFA are announced, benefiting instead  these countries, to the detriment of Ivorians who  see their poverty increasing.In the sector of ​​land, the case takes a more dramatic turn. The current "government"  is involve in Ivorian's land grabbing for the benefit of the  foreign African, French, American, European, etc..
 http://unwatchivorycoast.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/looted-and-underway-of-extinctionn.html
 This is why, while the land had been torn off or banned from Aboriginal as a classified forests, the government of (former) rebels supported by France, now offers the same land gracefully to his soldiers mercenaries of the ten year period of the coup and the war of France against Gbagbo. poor Ivorian !Worse, now the "government" of  French bombs and missiles  is giving away hundreds of thousands of hectares of the classified forest to  agricultural multinationals to degrade further Ivorian farmers and make him a stranger in his own land. Faced with this bleak expropriation of Ivory Coast from the hands of his worthy sons, it is important to draw the attention of the foreign to these vile acts and the serious injustices  suffered by the Ivorians. To the policymakers in these countries, we must remind them the events of 1958 when the Ivorian rose as one man to impose their rights to foreigners. It should therefore not be surprised to see the same reactions recur tomorrow . To the so called human rights organizations , who have now became silent before such atrocities and injustices, do not be surprised to see tomorrow patriotic leaders return to these  committed robberies and engage  necessary agrarian reforms  enabling the Ivorian  to get  possession of their (stolen)properties . It will be too late to hold forth as was the case in Zimbabwe, Mugabe the veteran-resistant. To the religious leaders and Ivorian traditional chiefs  who seem to accept this suffering of Ivorians, they should know that the memory of a people continues from generation to generation and the Ivorian land is an heritage left by G-d to this people abandoned today to this bloodthirsty regime serving the imperialists.  To the sadistic Club and greedy Western imperialists (CSVIO) and particularly  France, the main actors and beneficiaries of spoliation, in due time, pride Africans  will get rid of this chain of slavery and colonialism/imperialism they have suffered and continue to do so.Finally, to the Ivorian leaders of political "parties" conglomerate PDCI, RDR and (former) rebels who are on their conscience forever and their role as collaborators , the Ivorians will point you out forever and forever as those who delivered the only land that G-d gave them,  to their tormentors. 

NANWOULET G. Simone

La Côte-d'Ivoire est-elle encore aux ivoiriens ?

La Côte d’Ivoire est connue comme le pays au monde hébergeant le plus grand nombre d’étrangers sur son territoire. Le pourcentage officiel de 26% est de loin en deçà de la réalité car un grand nombre de ces personnes venues chercher asile ou faire fortune ont réussi à se faire passer et accepter comme ivoiriens.

L’un d’entre eux se trouve être aujourd‘hui imposé à la tête de ce pays. Comment comprendre pour quelqu’un qui serait né le 01/01/1942 dans une ville du V baoulé que c’est seulement en 1989, c’est-à-dire presqu’à 50 ans, qu’il puisse se faire établir une carte d’identité ivoirienne ?

Rappelons qu’il a toujours été permis et recommandé aux jeunes ivoiriens de se faire établir une carte d’identité nationale dès l’âge de 18 ans.

On est donc en droit de trouver fondées les décisions de la Cour Suprême qui ont chaque fois mentionné dans leurs conclusions la nationalité douteuse de cet homme étrange. De plus, l’acquisition d’un appartement à Abidjan et la décoration dont cet homme a bénéficié de la part des autorités ivoiriennes l’ont été avec une autre nationalité.

Aujourd’hui encore, les actes que cet homme pose attestent éloquemment de sa nationalité étrangère ; à commencer par sa garde rapprochée qui est confiée à des armées étrangères tout comme ses conseillers de tous ordres.

Son compatriote du pays soi-disant des hommes intègres a poussé l’outrecuidance jusqu’à délivrer un document attestant que cet homme n’a jamais été un national de ce pays. Quel grossier mensonge!

C’est pourquoi toutes les actions entreprises durant sa quête du pouvoir dans ce pays d’Eburnie sont marquées du sceau de la confusion identitaire. C’est ainsi qu’il a refusé que dans le cadre des audiences foraines, les populations se fassent enregistrer dans leur région d’origine. Dans la même veine, son parti, le RDR, a à cette occasion fait montre d’une violence inouïe contre les populations.

C’est pourquoi, il a imposé la reprise de l’opération d’identification des ivoiriens et cela sans la supervision des autorités officielles ivoiriennes. Et ce fut l’occasion d’une foire d’attributions injustifiées de la CNI à tout venant. C’est pourquoi, tous ses affidés ont pris soin de brûler tous les registres officiels des zones sous leur férule. Quel incivisme notoire !

Ainsi a été tronqué en faveur du candidat de l’étranger le fichier électoral ivoirien. Ils sont nombreux les voisins étrangers qui se sont rendus aux urnes pour voter le Président ivoirien puis les Présidents malien, burkinabè et guinéen. Quel est ce pays où des populations ont la possibilité de voter des Présidents de la République de différents pays dont ils n’ont pas la nationalité?

C’est pourquoi aussi dans l’exploitation honteuse du rattrapage ethnique, on peut trouver des responsables nommés par le Président de la République dont aucun des parents n’est ivoirien et qui n’ont jamais demandé la nationalité ivoirienne par naturalisation. On constate depuis le 11 Avril 2011 que la nationalité ivoirienne n’est aucunement utile pour occuper un poste stratégique dans l’armée ou l’administration. Celles-ci ne sont plus aux mains des ivoiriens. Tous les secteurs stratégiques et de souveraineté sont entre les mains de la France, du Burkina Faso et des pays de la sous-région. La France expérimente, au vu et au su de tous, la disparition d’un état, d’une de ses ex-colonies comme les occidentaux l’ont fait pour l’ex- Yougoslavie. Il s’agit de transformer la Côte d’Ivoire en un « no man’s land ».

C’est ce qui explique que les ivoiriens sont dépossédés de leurs terres au profit des nouveaux colons venus du Nord. Alors, on tue impunément les ivoiriens qui osent revendiquer une quelconque propriété. C’est à ce sujet que sont assassinés les ressortissants de l’Ouest ivoirien. On occupe les villas laissées vacantes par les cadres pro-Gbagbo pour en faire des mouroirs, des camps de concentration clandestins. On s’approprie les belles villas abandonnées temporairement par les propriétaires fuyant la barbarie de ses rebelles-criminels aux actions aussi macabres sinon pire que celles de ceux qu’on qualifie de terroristes pour justifier une intervention et plus tard une partition du Mali.

Toutes ces expropriations, ces distributions de récompenses pour activisme au sein de la rébellion qui a tué de nombreux ivoiriens s’accompagnent d’une dictature féroce contre l’opposition pour l’amener à adhérer manu militari à ses actions de dépossession et de destruction. Alors, on met en prison les valeureux militaires FDS et on recrute à la place des mercenaires étrangers dans l’armée régulière ivoirienne.

Dans l’administration, ce sont de nombreux (ex) rebelles, pour la plupart étrangers, qui sont recrutés sans concours et sans respecter les conditions habituelles imposées par l’administration ivoirienne. Ce pays de Gbagbo est de plus en plus donc livré au pillage par les étrangers français et d’Afrique de l’Ouest. C’est pourquoi, sans adjudication, des contrats faramineux sont offerts aux entreprises françaises et burkinabè dont les pays sont les commanditaires et exécuteurs des tueries perpétrées pour chasser Gbagbo du pouvoir. Ainsi, des milliards de FCFA sont annoncés, pour plutôt ces pays-là, au détriment des ivoiriens qui voient leur pauvreté s’accentuer.

Dans le domaine du foncier, l’affaire prend une tournure plus dramatique. Le pouvoir actuel participe à la spoliation des terres des ivoiriens au bénéfice des étrangers africains, français, américains, européens, etc. C’est pourquoi, alors que des terres avaient été arrachées ou interdites d’exploitation aux autochtones pour en faire des forêts classées, ce gouvernement d’(ex)rebelles soutenus par la France, offre aujourd’hui gracieusement ces mêmes terres à ses soldats mercenaires de ces dix années qu’ont duré le coup d’état et la guerre de la France contre Gbagbo. Pauvres ivoiriens !

Pire, maintenant ce gouvernement de bombes et de missiles français brade des centaines de milliers d’hectares à des multinationales du secteur agricole pour avilir davantage le paysan ivoirien et faire de lui un étranger sur ses propres terres. Devant ce tableau sombre d’expropriation de la Côte d’Ivoire des mains de ses dignes fils, il importe d’attirer l’attention de ces étrangers sur ces actes ignobles et ces graves injustices dont sont victimes les ivoiriens.

Aux responsables politiques de ces pays, il faut rappeler les événements de 1958 où les ivoiriens se sont levés comme un seul homme pour imposer leurs droits aux étrangers. Il ne faudra donc pas être surpris demain de voir les mêmes réactions se répéter.

Aux organisations dites de défense des droits humains, devenues aujourd’hui muettes devant tant d’atrocités et d’injustices, ne soyez pas surprises de voir demain des gouvernants- patriotes revenir sur ces spoliations et engager les réformes agraires nécessaires pour permettre aux ivoiriens d’entrer en possession de leurs biens. Ce sera alors trop tard de pérorer comme ce fut le cas au Zimbabwe, du vétéran-résistant Mugabé

Aux chefs religieux et aux chefs traditionnels ivoiriens qui semblent s’accommoder de cette souffrance des ivoiriens, qu’ils sachent que la mémoire d’un peuple demeure de génération en génération et que la terre ivoirienne est le patrimoine laissé par Dieu à ce peuple abandonné aujourd’hui à ce pouvoir sanguinaire au service de l’Etranger.

Au club de sadiques et voraces impérialistes occidentaux(CSVIO) et particulièrement à la France, acteurs principaux et bénéficiaires de cette spoliation, au temps marqué, les africains dignes sauront se défaire de cette chaîne de l’esclavagisme et du néocolonialisme qu’ils ont subis et continuent de vivre.

Enfin, aux responsables ivoiriens des partis politiques du conglomérat PDCI, RDR et (ex) rebelles qui portent sur leur conscience et pour toujours leur rôle de collabos pétainistes français, les ivoiriens les indexeront pour toujours et à jamais comme ceux qui auront livré, le seul pays que Dieu leur a donné, à leurs bourreaux.

NANWOULET G. Simone

Stuffed elephant

French exotic cuisine with an international catering. This recipe has for ingredients  the world geopolitics  beginning  in Haiti. And it is not a coincidence because it's the first African sovereign nation outside the continent which has once again become the first state to lose its independence since the presence on its territory of UN (catering service by excellence) being an ancient French colony with links  known to the French West Africa.For those who believe that the UN and the entire international community should be  trusted please  check :

Haiti's sham election shames US

Washington cannot confer legitimacy on this flawed election that does nothing for Haitians living under tarps, menaced by cholera

UN soldiers from Sri Lanka at the Haitian election tabulation centre in Port-au-Prince. The elections ended in confusion on Sunday, as 12 of the 18 presidential candidates denounced 'massive fraud', although international observers insist the eventual result will stand. Photograph: Eduardo Munoz/Reuters

The election in Haiti shows, once again, how low Washington's standards are for democracy in countries that they want to control politically. And there is no doubt who is in charge there. There is a government, to be sure, but since the elected government in 2004 was overthrown, and even more since the earthquake, it is the "international community" that calls the shots – Hillary Clinton's code for the US state department.
The election was a farce to begin with, once the non-independent CEP (Provisional Electoral Council) decided to exclude the country's largest political party from participating, along with other parties: Fanmi Lavalas is the party of Haiti's most popular political leader, Jean-Bertrand Aristide. It has won every election that it has contested. Aristide himself remains in exile – unable to return since the US-sponsored overthrow of his government in 2004.
Imagine holding an election in the United States with both the Democratic and Republican parties prohibited from participating. If we look at other troubled elections in the world – Iran in 2009, or Afghanistan more recently – Haiti's is even less legitimate. It is perhaps most comparable to the recent election in Burma.
But the United States government paid for this election, and was determined to go ahead with it and get the usual suspects to endorse it. The pleadings of 45 Democratic members of Congress, who sent a letter to Hillary Clinton on 7 October asking for a real election with all political parties included, were ignored. So, too, were the objections of President Obama's Republican foreign policy mentor, Senator Richard Lugar.
By Sunday, the day of the election, 12 of the 18 presidential candidates – basically, every prominent presidential candidate except the current government's choice, Jude Celestin – had publicly called for the elections to be annulled. They were backed by thousands of demonstrators in the streets.
The conduct of the elections turned out to be even worse than expected. There were widespread reports of people being unable to vote because they were not on the voter lists, incidents of ballot-stuffing, and other irregularities.
Despite all of this, the Organisation of American States issued its statement on Monday: "The Joint Mission does not believe that these irregularities, serious as they were, necessarily invalidated the process." No wonder the leaders of Latin America and the Caribbean met last February and decided to create a new regional organisation without the United States and Canada.
Haiti, of course, has bigger problems than a bogus election. And, in fact, that was a complaint heard on the ground – why was money being wasted on an electoral circus when people do not have access to drinking water, and the country is in the middle of a cholera epidemic? The latter crisis seems to have been pushed off the world's radar screen by the election, despite the fact that the United Nations has been able to raise only around 10% of the $164m they need to treat an epidemic that is estimated to grow to 400,000 cases of cholera in the next year.
And then there is the unbelievable failure of the reconstruction itself. Nearly a year after the earthquake, less than 2% of the rubble has been cleared, and less than 10% of the 1.5m people made homeless by the earthquake have shelter. Most of the rest are living under tarps, with the earth beneath them turning to water and mud when it rains. The "international community" could not even get them tents.
Yet the bogus election does matter because, if allowed to stand, it will foist an illegitimate government on Haiti. For most of its existence, and until quite recently, Haiti was ruled by illegitimate governments that relied heavily on violence to maintain power. Aristide was the first democratically elected president, in 1990. He was overthrown seven months later, but eventually re-elected in 2000. Because his government was legitimate and did not have to rely on violence, he abolished the army – which was the main instrument of political violence. Washington never forgave him for this, and organised an international cutoff of aid to the country, while pouring tens of millions of dollars into the opposition, thus toppling the government.
In April of 2009, an election that also excluded the largest political party resulted in a boycott of about 90% of the electorate. Participation in this latest election appears to have been higher (although lower than the previous presidential election), but it will not be seen as legitimate. This has already increased social unrest. There is no longer a Haitian army, but there is a badly-trained national police force and a UN military force (MINUSTAH), which is widely seen as an occupying army and is notorious for its violence and human rights abuses. Its standing has fallen even further as it appears to be the source of the cholera epidemic.
Haiti needs a government that can contribute to the reconstruction of the country, its public health and the institutions necessary to promote economic development and employment. An illegitimate government won't meet any of these needs, and only raises the risk of increasing political violence.
• Editor's note: A typographical error meant that this article originally stated that Aristide's government was re-elected in 2004; this has been amended (at 13:30 EST on 2 December 2010) to 2000. As stated elsewhere in the article, 2004 was the year Aristide's government was deposed.

Mark Weisbrot

All these incidents do not prevent the head of the UN mission in Haiti, Edmond Mulet, to ensure that everything goes well. "The atmosphere is peaceful, tranquil, serene and violence in Haiti on the circumstances," he said at a press conference yesterday.However, in the street, this optimism is nonexistent. And suspicions of fraud are raising tensions on the eve of a vote where the regime of President René Préval feels threatened. They also fuel the skepticism of voters, many of whom summarize the electoral process in a single word: scam ....... The remake of the scenario in Ivory Coast ....and yet there are still those who continue to speak of the recognition of the so  called international community or the UN certification ..  ..... if we add Afghanistan where the UN  was in collusion with the ambassadors of USA and France and some EU diplomats we can see the same fraud and certification in Ivory Coast ..
The international community has two good reasons to vouch for an impeccable legality of the (rigged) vote.The first is the need to legitimize the military intervention in Afghanistan to the public opinion of NATO won by fatigue. The second also affects the legitimacy of its presence in Afghanistan, but with the Afghan opinion this time. "If the international community condones fraud Karzai warns Fahim Dashty, the editor of Kabul Weekly, while Afghans think:" What is the reason for his presence here, why do not we be fighting? '"Electoral fraud: Karzai against attack
Afghan President Hamid Karzai at the Independent Election Commission in Kabul, April 1, 2010.REUTERS / Ahmad Masood RFI 
President Hamid Karzai, constantly pressed against corruption that plagues Afghanistan to its government, returned Thursday 1 April 2010 on the ropes the international community, accusing him of having organized themassive fraud during his re-election in August 2009. At the forefront of accusations by Hamid Karzai, the offices of the UN and the European Union in Afghanistan and some embassies, the Afghan president has not identified (in some media the ambassadors are identified as those of the USA, and France, just like in the Ivory Coast).His accusations are far-reaching: Karzai says that there has been fraud in the elections last August, the "massive fraud", "very solid," he insisted, during a meeting with members of the electoral commission. More importantly, it criminalizes the office of deputy representative to the UN, Peter Galbraith (the same one who exposed the fraud to the media), and that of Philippe Morillon, the French general who headed the observer mission of the European Union in this election.So what the international community and the UN in the same scenario with the usual four players (USA, France, EU, UN) are different when it comes to the Ivory Coast? So to achieve their goal for the Ivory Coast multinationals preparation started it there over 25 years and the stuffed elephant was invented. The stuffed elephant is certainly a new  culinary French specialty   , but it has  always been a Gallic reputation  internationally recognized to the extent that the international community, or more specifically the multinationals in their  project of the new world order have made the French the spear head. 
When electoral fraud is met by congratulations
By Stephen Gowans
November 03, 2009 - what's left
It has become standard practice in many parts of the world for opposition candidates to decry as fraudulent election results that favor the incumbent. Charges of vote fraud are routinely levelled against governing parties that win elections contested by opposition parties backed by Western governments.
For example, after (and even before) Zimbabwe's last set of elections, the governing Zanu-PF party was accused of vote fraud, but the evidence for the opposition's claim was gathered by organizations funded by the United States, a major backer of the opposition movement. Washington makes no secret of its desire to drive the incumbent president, Robert Mugabe, from power, by hook or crook, not because he's corrupt, despotic or a human rights abuser, as Washington alleges, but because he has done what all foreign leaders back to Lenin have done who have fallen astray of Washington – failed to honor contracts and safeguard private property. (That's not to say Mugabe and Lenin are alike in any way other than having committed what in Washington's view is the supreme crime.) A cooked exit poll is not beyond the motivations and capabilities of US and British-backed anti-Mugabe forces, but that's largely beside the point. Mugabe's Zanu-PF did poorly in the election, and Mugabe, himself, failed to win a first round victory in the presidential election. If Zanu-PF rigged the vote, it blundered badly.
Similarly, the outcome of the last Iranian presidential election, which saw the return to power of the incumbent president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, was denounced by the opposition as a fraud. The charge was taken up by Western politicians, journalists and a substantial fraction of the Western left, despite the opposition's failure to produce a single jot of credible evidence that the election was stolen. Worse, the sole methodologically sound public opinion poll taken prior to the election – funded by the international arm of the Republican Party, the IRI – predicted that Ahmadinejad would win by a wide margin – wider, it turns out, than the margin he actually did win by. This was a case of widespread distaste for Ahmadinejad and Iran's Islamic Revolution leading to the collective dulling of critical faculties. To be sure, if one hated Ahmadinejad and fundamentalist Islam (or fundamentalist religion, period), witnessing Iranians embrace secular Western enlightenment values was bracing indeed. The only problem was there was no evidence it actually happened.
We might expect, then, that charges of vote fraud will be routinely levelled against governing parties that win elections contested by opposition parties backed by Western governments, and that the Western media will accept the charges uncritically. This happens regularly.
But what of cases in which the weight of evidence points to an incumbent, backed by the US government, winning an election by fraud? How might we expect Western politicians, Western media, and even the UN, to react? One would predict that they would try to cover it up, and failing that, minimize its significance. Conspicuously absent would be the indignant denunciations that attend the electoral losses of parties backed by Western governments.
In Afghanistan's August presidential elections, the incumbent, Hamid Karzai, who had initially been installed in his position by the US government, failed to win a first round victory. This we know now, largely owing to the efforts of the UN's former number two man in Afghanistan, Peter Galbraith, who blew the whistle on extensive fraud perpetrated by the Karzai-appointed Independent Electoral Commission. [1] Also involved in the fraud, according to a recent New York Times report, was the president's brother, Ahmed Wali Karzai. [2]
Galbraith charged that the Karzai appointed electoral commission abandoned "its published anti-fraud policies, allowing it to include enough fraudulent votes in the final tally to put Karzai over the 50 percent threshold needed to avoid a runoff." Galbraith estimated that "as many as 30 percent of Karzai's votes were fraudulent." But when he "called the chief electoral officer to urge him to stick with the original guidelines, Karzai issued a formal protest accusing" Galbraith of foreign interference. Galbraith's boss, Kai Eide "sided with Karzai", effectively concealing the electoral fraud. [3] Eide told Galbraith that "the UN mandate was only to support the Afghan institutions in their decisions, not to tell them to hold an honest election." [4]
At the centre of the fraud were ghost polling centres (1,500 inaccessible locations that were physically impossible to confirm the existence of), a corrupt election commission, [5] and the president's brother. Ahmed Wali Karzai, "a suspected player in the country's booming illegal trade" receives "regular payments from the Central Intelligence Agency." He "orchestrated the manufacture of hundreds of thousands of phony ballots" [6] and "is also believed to have been responsible for setting up dozens of so-called ghost polling stations — existing only on paper — that were used to manufacture tens of thousands of phony ballots." [7]
In other words, the UN was involved in an attempt to cover up vote fraud, while the CIA, through the president's brother, was at least indirectly involved in perpetrating it.
Some US news analysts, dismissing the affair as of little consequence, insist the runner-up, Abdullah Abdullah, stood no chance against Karzai in a fair vote anyway. But an honest account of the initial vote "would have had Karzai at 41% and Abdullah at 34%," [8] putting Abdullah well within striking distance of victory in a run-off election. Abdullah, however, refused to participate, arguing that there was no reason to believe the run-off would be any less corrupt than the initial vote. He has a point. While Karzai's electoral commission was asked to eliminate "the ghost polling centres and to replace staff who committed fraud," Karzai increased the number of centres and rehired the authors of the initial fraud. [9]
The sole concern of officials in Washington – who, when their favored candidates abroad fail to win elections, present themselves as champions of fair elections and lead the charge to have the allegedly fraudulent election overturned — has not been that the Afghan election was stolen, or that Abdullah withdrew because the prospects for a fair run-off were slim. On the contrary, with Karzai winning another term as president only because Abdullah withdrew over legitimate fears the run-off election would be unfair, the official US response has been to "congratulate President Karzai on his victory in this historic election and look forward to working with him." [10] Instead, Washington's sole concern has been the exposure of electoral fraud, and its effect in undermining the legitimacy of their man in Kabul (who never had much legitimacy in the first place.)
Contrast the US reaction with the sharp Western criticism of Robert Mugabe after Morgan Tsvangirai withdrew from the run-off round of Zimbabwe's last presidential election, claiming the conditions were not conducive to a fair vote. The difference is as wide as night and day.
Where are the stern lectures, the US-government and ruling class foundation-assisted nonviolent pro-democracy activists, the blanket mass media coverage of Afghanistan's stolen election, the denunciations of Karzai as a dictator – all which attend the defeat of US-backed opposition movements in elections where the charges of fraud have become routine and the evidence for fraud bare to non-existent?
The reaction to electoral fraud, then, depends on the answer to a single question: Does Washington back the beneficiary of the alleged fraud or not? Or more fundamentally, does the beneficiary promote the sanctity of contracts, private property, free trade, free enterprise and free markets? If the answer is no, the reaction will be one of indignation and outrage, even where the evidence of fraud is thin to absent. If the answer is yes, the reaction will be muted, even where the evidence of fraud is voluminous and incontrovertible. Between Zimbabwe and Iran on the one hand, and Afghanistan on the other, official outrage, and therefore the outrage of the media, and therefore the outrage of the people, including a substantial part of the left, has been inversely proportional to the weight of evidence that fraud has actually occurred.
Washington cares not one whit about democracy — only about the interests of the corporations, investors and banks that dominate its policy-making. If "democracy" comports to those interests, well and good. If not, there are no phoney allegations of electoral fraud Washington is not prepared to take a hand in propagating, and no genuine electoral fraud it is unwilling to live with.
Notes:
1. Peter W. Galbraith, "What I saw at the Afghan election," The Washington Post, October 4, 2009.
2. Dexter Filkins, Mark Mazzetti and James Risen, "Brother of Afghan leader is said to be on C.I.A payroll," The New York Times, October 28, 2009.
3. Galbraith, October 4.
4. Peter Galbraith, "Karzai was hellbent on victory. Afghans will pay the price," The Guardian (UK), November 2, 2009.
5. Ibid.
6. Filkins, Mazzetti and Risen, October 28.
7. Ibid.
8. Galbraith, November 2.
9. Ibid.
10. Statement of U.S. Embassy in Kabul, reported in Michael Muskal, "U.S. congratulates Afghan President Karzai on another term in office," Los Angeles Times, November 2, 2009.
Source: what's left
Email: zimbabwecrisis@yahoo.com

Visit: Zimbabwe Watch
So were the elections in Ivory Coast  :

The reaction to electoral fraud, then, depended on the answer to a single question: Does Washington or Paris as well as the so called international community  and multinational corporates back the beneficiary of the alleged fraud or not? Or more fundamentally, does the beneficiary which in the case of Ivory Coast was Ouattara promote the sanctity of contracts, private property, free trade, free enterprise and free markets? The answer was yes since he's in Africa on behalf of the IMF and all the multinationals,  so  the reaction has been muted, even where the evidence of fraud was voluminous and incontrovertible. The UN special representative a that time Mr Choi said that the incidents(frauds were insignificant and even if there were to be taken into account Ouattara  still the winner ...Yet he and the international community as well as their backing candidate  refused the recount of the ballot to prove their point ...very strange for people who claim promoting democracy to chose bombarding the incumbent president(who asked for the vote recounting) residency and count the death toll  rather than recounting the ballot of a disputed election result as any democratic country would do....And that was previously done in the US and even Iran as well as others countries  and recently in Haiti  .... But that was refused to the Ivorian people that's how the elephant was stuffed  catered by the  "international community " in Ivory Coast now transformed into a vast elephant grave.

Farci d'éléphant

Cuisine exotique Française avec un service traiteur internationale. Cette recette a pour ingrédients le survole du monde geopolitique  On commencera ainsi en Haiti, et ce n'est pas un hasard car ce pays  première nation Afro souveraine hors du continent redevenu  le premier état a perdre son indépendance depuis la présence sur son territoire de l'ONU(le service traiteur par excellence) est une ancienne colonie gauloise avec les liens qu'on lui connaît de l'Afrique Occidental Française.


Pour ceux qui croient que l'ONU et toute la prétendue communauté internationale soient digne de confiance checkez  le simulacre électoral en Haït  qui a fait la honte  aux US et de l'ONU:Washington ne peut pas conférer une légitimité à cette élection viciée qui n'apporte rien pour les Haïtiens vivant sous des bâches, menacée par le choléra
 Les soldats de l'ONU du Sri Lanka au centre de tabulation élection haïtienne à Port-au-Prince. Les élections terminée dans la confusion, le dimanche,  12 des 18 candidats à la présidentielle ont dénoncé «une fraude massive», bien que les observateurs internationaux insistent pour que le résultat final soient maintenue. (Le scenario des elections 2010 en Cote Divoire) Photo: Eduardo Munoz / ReutersL'élection en Haïti montre, une fois de plus, comment les normes bas de Washington sont pour la démocratie dans les pays qu'ils veulent contrôler politiquement. Et il ne fait aucun doute qui est en charge là-bas. Il ya un gouvernement, pour être sûr, mais depuis que le gouvernement élu en 2004 a été renversé, et plus encore depuis le tremblement de terre, c'est la «communauté internationale» qui appelle les coups de feu - Code d'Hillary Clinton au département d'état américain.L'élection était une farce, pour commencer, une fois que le SCEP non indépendant (Conseil Electoral Provisoire) a décidé d'exclure le plus grand parti politique du pays de participer, avec d'autres parties: Fanmi Lavalas est le parti d'Haïti leader politique le plus populaire, Jean- Bertrand Aristide. Il a remporté toutes les élections qu'il a contesté. Aristide lui-même reste en exil - l'impossibilité de rentrer depuis le renversement parrainée par son gouvernement en 2004.Imaginez la tenue d'une élection aux Etats-Unis avec les deux partis démocrate et républicain interdit de participer. Si l'on regarde d'autres élections troublées dans le monde - l'Iran en 2009, ou plus récemment en Afghanistan - Haïti est encore moins légitime. Il est peut-être plus comparable à la récente élection en Birmanie.(moi je dirais que les élections en Cote D'ivoire ont été  la pire en ce qui concerne les fraudes)Mais le gouvernement des États-Unis payé pour cette élection, et était déterminé à aller de l'avant et obtenir les suspects habituels de l'approuver. Les plaidoiries de 45 membres démocrates du Congrès, qui ont envoyé une lettre à Hillary Clinton le 7 Octobre demandant une vraie élection avec tous les partis politiques compris, ont été ignorés. Donc, aussi, étaient les objections du président Obama mentor politique étrangère républicain, le sénateur Richard Lugar.Le dimanche, le jour de l'élection, 12 des 18 candidats à la présidentielle - en fait, tous les candidats de premier plan présidentielle, sauf le choix du gouvernement actuel, Jude Célestin - avait publiquement appelé à des élections doit être annulée. Ils ont été soutenus par des milliers de manifestants dans les rues.Le déroulement des élections s'est avéré être encore pire que prévu. Il y avait des rapports faisant état de personnes ne pouvant pas voter parce qu'ils ne figuraient pas sur les listes électorales, les incidents de bourrage des urnes et autres irrégularités.Malgré tout cela, l'Organisation des États américains a publié son communiqué publié lundi: «La mission conjointe ne pense pas que ces irrégularités soient aussi graves, qu' ils 'seraient, nécessaire l invalidation  de processus." Pas étonnant que les dirigeants de l'Amérique latine et les Caraïbes aient rencontré en Février dernier et aient décidé de créer une nouvelle organisation régionale sans les Etats-Unis et au Canada.Haïti, bien sûr, a d'autre  problèmes qu'une élection bidon. Et, en fait, c'était une plainte entendue sur le terrain - pourquoi c'était de l'argent gaspillé pour un cirque électoral où les gens n'ont pas accès à l'eau potable, et le pays est en plein milieu d'une épidémie de choléra? La crise-ci semble avoir été poussé hors de l'écran radar du monde par l'élection, en dépit du fait que l'Organisation des Nations Unies ait pu augmenter que d'environ 10% de la somme de 164 millions dont ils ont besoin pour traiter une épidémie qui est estimé  croître à 400.000 des cas de choléra dans la prochaine année.
Mark Weisbrot guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 1 December 2010 23.27 GMT
Tous ces incidents n'empêchent pas le chef de la mission de l'ONU en Haïti, Edmond Mulet, d'assurer que tout se passe très bien. «Le climat est apaisé, tranquille, serein et sans violence dans les circonstances haïtiennes», a-t-il assuré en conférence de presse hier.
Pourtant, dans la rue, cet optimisme est inexistant. Et les soupçons de fraude font monter la tension, à la veille d'un vote où le régime du président René Préval se sent menacé. Ils alimentent aussi le scepticisme des électeurs, qui sont nombreux à résumer le processus électoral par un seul mot: magouille.......Le remake du scenario en Cote D'ivoire ....
<iframe frameborder="0" width="480" height="276" src="http://www.dailymotion.com/embed/video/xg26kw"></iframe><br /><a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xg26kw_cote-d-ivoire-comment-sortir-de-l-impasse_news" target="_blank">C&ocirc;te d&rsquo;Ivoire : comment sortir de l&rsquo;impasse ?</a> <i>by <a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/LCP" target="_blank">LCP</a></i>

Avec ça il y en a encore qui continuent de parler de reconnaissance de la prétendue communauté internationale ou certification de l'ONU..pffff.....si on rajoute l'Afghanistan ou l'ONU e fait en complicité avec les ambassadeurs des USA et de la France ainsi que certains diplomates de l'UE les mêmes fraudes et certification qu'en Cote D'ivoire..
La communauté internationale a deux autres bonnes raisons de se porter garante d'une irréprochable légalité du scrutin(truqué).

La première tient à la nécessité de légitimer l'intervention militaire en Afghanistan auprès des opinions publiques des pays de l'OTAN gagnées par la lassitude. La seconde touche aussi à la légitimité de sa présence en Afghanistan, mais auprès de l'opinion afghane cette fois. «Si la communauté internationale cautionne les fraudes de Karzaï, met en garde Fahim Dashty, le rédacteur en chef du Kabul Weekly, alors les Afghans penseront: "Quelle est la raison de sa présence ici? Pourquoi ne la combattrions-nous pas?"»

Fraude électorale : le président Karzaï contre-attaque

Le président afghan Hamid Karzaï devant la Commission électorale indépendante à Kaboul, le 1er avril 2010.

REUTERS/Ahmad Masood

Par RFI

Le président Hamid Karzaï, constamment pressé de lutter contre la corruption en Afghanistan qui gangrène jusqu'à son gouvernement, a renvoyé jeudi 1er avril 2010 dans les cordes la communauté internationale en l'accusant d'avoir organisé les
fraudes massives lors de sa réélection en août 2009. En première ligne des accusations proférées par Hamid Karzaï, les bureaux de l'ONU et de l'Union européenne en Afghanistan ainsi que certaines ambassades, que le président afghan n'a pas identifiées( RFI ment comme d'habitude car dans les médias Anglophones les ambassadeurs sont bien identifiés comme étant  ceux des USA, et de la France, exactement comme en Cote D'ivoire).

Ses accusations vont très loin : le président Karzaï affirme qu'il y a bien eu des fraudes lors des élections du mois d'août dernier, des «fraudes massives», «très massives» a-t-il insisté, au cours d'une réunion avec les membres de la commission électorale. Mais surtout, il incrimine le bureau du représentant adjoint de l'ONU, Peter Galbraith(celui même qui a exposé la fraude aux médias), et celui de Philippe Morillon, le général français qui dirigeait la mission d'observateurs de l'Union européenne lors de cette élection.

So en quoi cette communauté internationale et l'ONU dans le même scènario avec les habituels 4 acteurs (USA. France, UE, ONU) seraient diffèrents quand il s'agit de la Cote D'ivoire ? So pour atteindre leur but concernant la Cote d'ivoire  les multinationales  ont commencee leur préparation il y plus de 25 ans et le farci d'éléphant a été inventee. Le farci d'éléphant est certes une nouvelle spécialité dans le domaine culinaire Français mais toujours est il que la réputation des gaulois reste internationalement reconnue au point que la communauté internationale ou plus précisément les multinationales dans leur project du nouvel ordre mondial en ont fait leur fer de lance.