URGENT ALERT ALERT ALERT = ======

URGENT ALERT ALERT ALERT = ======
KEKE KATA The Minister who was detained in  Boundiali spokesman of the prisoners released recently , and has been released (among the twenty released) has been arrested again by Ouattara, !
He is currently detained by the Ivorian DST . It is still retained by his henchmen in the service of Ouattara! Convey a warning to the maximum so that concrete actions are carried out and warn others released from the opportunity to be still imprisoned by men in the service of coup! Share to please as many people

IMPUNITY ALERT! ALERT ALERT !!!!

IMPUNITY ALERT! ALERT ALERT !!!!!

On the night of Friday 11 to Saturday 12, the FRCI heavily armed surrounded the village of Adon KOI, 5 km from Attinguié, located at 30 km from Abidjan on the Northern Highway. these killers since April 11 have been used to commit atrocities in the region of origin of Prof. Ake Ngbo(PM of the legal government overthrown by the UN/France) have gone undercover by laying siege to the village at 2 am. The reason for the abuse was to collect the revenue  of the cooperative,They rubbed  money from villagers, their bikes and the revenues of the cooperative were washed away. Unheard-of violence were perpetrated on the preacher, the teacher of the village and some villagers.

The criminals  left the village at 4 am ... promising to return soon.

As usual UNOCI arrived in good doctor after death, to draw his admission of impotence.

We'd rather say complicity since we know that these murderers were dropped in these localities by the UN ... one wonders if these abuses targeted will end one day ....(It's probably to prove to the international opinion that Ivory Coast is insecure and needs more UN troops this would tighten the grips of the NWQ on this nation )

The law case of the century: Indictment against NATO military and political leaders

 

The law case of the century: Indictment against NATO military and political leaders (UPDATED)
NATO: Indictment for breach of international law in the Great Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya. The military and political leaders of NATO are hereby accused of the following crimes committed in the Libyan campaign of 2011, in which the systematic breaches of international law are underlined.
Understanding that international law exists and that it is systematically broken by certain powers with impunity, understanding that such a situation is unacceptable and that the same set of laws should apply to all, equally, with the same sets of weights and measures employed in upholding it, I hereby accuse NATO and the below-mentioned individuals, party to its acts in the Great Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya from February to September (ongoing) 2011, of breach of international law;
1. Accusation: NATO war crimes, crimes against humanity, breach of UN Charter, Breach of UNSC Resolutions, breach of Geneva Conventions, occasioning murder, attempted murder, actions occasioning grievous and actual bodily harm, destruction of private and public property.
2. Accused:

Anders Fogh Rasmussen (Denmark) NATO Secretary-General; Charles Bouchard (Canada), Commander of Operations; Nicolas Sarkozy, Édouard Guillaud (France); Rinaldo Veri, Commander Allied Maritime Command (Italy); David Cameron, Sir Stuart Peach (UK); Barack Obama, Carter Ham, Sam Locklear (USA); Harald Sunde (Norway), Abdullah II (Jordan); Hamad bin Khalifa al Thani (Qatar), Khalifa bin Zayed al Nahyan (UAE); Sverker Goranson (Sweden) and the Defence Ministers Pieter de Crem (Belgium), Anuy Angelov (Bulgaria), Gitte Lillelund Bech (Denmark); Panos Beglitis (Greece); Hans Hillen (Netherlands); Gabriel Oprea (Romania);Carme Chacón Piqueras (Spain); Ismet Yilmaz (Turkey), Liam Fox (UK), Ignazio La Russa (Italy), Gérard Longuet (France).
William Hague (UK), Hillary Clinton (USA) Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini
(?)
3. Law and breaches:
3.1 Proper procedure was not followed: Under the UN Charter, any military action which comes outside a UNSC Resolution in any theatre of conflict must necessarily come from a separate Resolution in the UNSC and any military action must come after the Military Council is convened. This was not the case under UNSC Resolutions 1970 and 1973 (2011) covering the Libyan conflict.
Why did NATO not convene the Military Staff Committee of the UNSC? Under the UN Charter, Chapter VII, Article 46: "Plans for the application of armed force shall be made by the Security Council with the assistance of the Military Staff Committee". Such committee was never convened.

This is a violation of the UN Charter rendering Resolutions 1970 and 1973 (2011) void; There is also evidence that such Resolutions were passed on the evidence from a false flag event. The supposed crimes committed by the Libyan authorities have been hotly contested and must be investigated;
3.2 Intervention in domestic affairs of a sovereign state: UNSC Resolution 2131 (XX) of 21 December 1965, containing the Declaration on the Inadmissibility of Intervention in the Domestic Affairs of States was backed up by Resolutions 31/91 of 14 December 1976, 32/153 of 19 December 1977, 33/74 of 15 December 1978, 34/101 of 14 December 1979 and 35/159 of 12 December 1980 on non-interference in the internal affairs of States.
3.3 Bombardment of undefended buildings and structures: Article 3 of the Statute of The Hague International Penal Court which states clearly that one criterion for indictment for war crimes is:

"Attack or bombardment, by whatever means, against undefended cities, towns, villages, buildings or houses".

Another clause of the same Article 3 could also be invoked:

"Massive destruction of cities, towns or villages or destruction not justified by military necessity".

The attack on Libya's water supply network on Friday July 22 and the attack on the factory making pipes for the supply system on Saturday July 23 in al-Brega were not covered under "military necessity" in which case, under Article 3, this was an act of wanton destruction of civilian structures with military hardware. This renders NATO liable for trial by its own court, the ICC at The Hague;
3.4 Support for outlawed organizations and individuals. Despite this admission:
http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/counter-terrorism/
proscribed-terror-groups/proscribed-groups?view=Binary ...
There is evidence that armed groups fighting inside Libya include the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) which according to the British Government: "The LIFG seeks to replace the current Libyan regime with a hard-line Islamic state. The group is also part of the wider global Islamist extremist movement, as inspired by Al Qa'ida. The group has mounted several operations inside Libya, including a 1996 attempt to assassinate Mu'ammar Qadhafi" and for which reason is on the Home Office list of proscribed terrorist groups, despite this, the UK aided and abetted the said group;
3.5 Failure to apply international law: Under the UN Charter, Chapter VI, Article 33, member states must "seek a solution by negotiation, enquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, judicial settlement, resort to regional agencies or arrangements, or other peaceful means of their own choice".
3.6 The Jamahiriya Government of Libya had the right to defend itself without being attacked: Chapter VII, Article 51 refers to the right of States to defend themselves against armed insurgency:

"Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security";
3.7 Mercenaries: UNSC Resolution 1973 (2011), in its Chapter on Protection of Civilians, in paragraph 4. states:
"4. Authorizes Member States that have notified the Secretary-General, acting nationally or through regional organizations or arrangements, and acting in cooperation with the Secretary-General, to take all necessary measures, notwithstanding paragraph 9 of resolution 1970 (2011), to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, including Benghazi, while excluding a foreign occupation force of any form on any part of Libyan territory, and requests the Member States concerned to inform the Secretary-General immediately of the measures they take pursuant to the authorization conferred by this paragraph which shall be immediately reported to the Security Council;
There have been numerous reports of mercenaries being used by NATO and the rebels it supported; French Foreign Legion, Egyptians, Qataris, UAE forces, among others;
3.8 Boots on the ground: UNSC Resolution 1970 (2011) Paragraph 16:
"16. Deplores the continuing flows of mercenaries into the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya and calls upon all Member States to comply strictly with their obligations under paragraph 9 of resolution 1970 (2011) to prevent the provision of armed mercenary personnel to the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya;".
If David Cameron has admitted that UK special services have assisted the terrorists on the ground, this is against the UN mandate which allowed NATO to intervene in Libya, and is a war crime.
 A request has been sent (August 30) to the British FCO and Ministry of Defence to confirm or deny that troops have been used in the theatre of operations; no reply has been forthcoming;
3.9 Non-enforcement of UN Resolution, and violation of international law, by transporting rebel forces to enter the theatre of operations:
UNSC Resolution 1970 (2011):
In the Chapter on Enforcement of the arms embargo, Paragraph 13 of the same states:
"13. Decides that paragraph 11 of resolution 1970 (2011) shall be replaced by the following paragraph : "Calls upon all Member States, in particular States of the region, acting nationally or through regional organisations or arrangements, in order to ensure strict implementation of the arms embargo established by paragraphs 9 and 10 of resolution 1970 (2011), to inspect in their territory, including seaports and airports, and on the high seas, vessels and aircraft bound to or from the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, if the State concerned has information that provides reasonable grounds to believe that the cargo contains items the supply, sale, transfer or export of which is prohibited by paragraphs 9 or 10 of Resolution 1970 (2011) as modified by this resolution, including the provision of armed mercenary personnel, calls upon all flag States of such vessels and aircraft to cooperate with such inspections and authorises Member States to use all measures commensurate to the specific circumstances to carry out such inspections";
In violation of this: supply of French Milan anti-tank missiles, Swedish Carl Gustav 84mm rifles, 68mm rockets and mortars and Maadi assault rifles from Egypt; this, in addition to the British, French and Italian military advisors helping the terrorists.
3.10 Violation of Geneva Conventions:  NATO and the Transitional National Council have given the people of Sirte ten days to surrender or face a full military onslaught. This is not a cease-fire. While they await their fate, they will still be subject to artillery fire and NATO bombing, and food, water and electricity have already been cut off.
These siege tactics have been outlawed by the Geneva Conventions. In particular, Article 14 of the second Protocol to the Geneva Conventions states, "Starvation of civilians as a method of combat is prohibited. It is therefore prohibited to attack, destroy, remove or render useless for that purpose objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population such as food-stuffs, agricultural areas for the production of food-stuffs, crops, livestock, drinking water installations, and supplies and irrigation works."

The 4th Geneva Convention prohibits all forms of attacks on civilians and the collective punishment of civilian populations, so virtually everything that the combined TNC-NATO forces are doing to the people of Sirte is strictly illegal and in fact criminal.
4. Sample Crimes:
21.03.2011. Tens of civilians killed on 31st of March in Gharyan city in western Libya (video).
07.04.2011. --- NATO bombers killed 15 rebels and wounded 22 on the outskirts of Brega.
20.04.2011. TRIPOLI NATO Bombing The Libyan Arab Association For Human Rights (video).
27.04.2011. --- NATO attacked the city of Misrata, killing 12 people and wounding 5 others.
30.04.2011. --- The bombing of the Downs Syndrome School in Tripoli (video).
30.04.2011.--- NATO killed inocent civilinas: The youngest son of our great leader Saif Al arab gaddafi was only 29 years old, grandchildren of our Great Leader, Saif Mohammed Muammar Gaddafi was one year and 3 months (born on 30 January 2010) , Carthage Hannibal Muammar Gaddafi was 2 years and 9 months old (born on 2 August 2008) and Mastura Humaid (daughter of Aisha) was 4 months and half (she was born on 15 December 2010) (video).
09.05.2011. --- 600 civilians are reported dead after getting into trouble on thier boat. They send urgent SOS messages to NATO, but they were ignored (video).
13.05.2011. The 11 imams (spiritual leaders of Islam) that were killed. The imams were killed in a NATO bombing in the city of Brega (east), which also injured about 50 people. (video)
17.05.2011.---The NATO attack on Libya's Anti-Corruption Agency on May 17 was extremely convenient for some Westrern politicians (video).
12.06.2011. --- The bombing of the University of Tripoli. Death toll not yet established. (link) or photo evdence.
15.06.2011. --- At least 12 people were killed and two injured when a NATO air strike hit a bus Wednesday evening in Libya's Kikla city (video).
19.06.2011. --- 9 civilians were killed by a NATO air strike on Tripoli (video).
19.06.2011. --- Massacre of Al-Hamedi family 15 civilians, including 3 children, were killed by another NATO air strike on Sorman (link).
19.06.2011. --- Firetracs was bombed (video).
22.06.2011. --- The bombing of the Great Man made Waterway irrigation system, which supplies most Libyans with their drinking water. Water for 4,5 million INOCENT CIVILIANS IN LIBYA (video).
22.06.2011. -- Zliten - many civilians were chopped into pieces. (link)
28.06. 2011. --- NATO air strike killed 16 civilians (one whole family killed) and more than 20 injured in public market in Tawergha east of Misurata (video).
04.07.2011. --- NATO bombing civilian checkpoint in ZWARA. (video)
15.07.2011. --- At least 12 people were killed and 2 injured when a NATO. The air strike hit the bus with inocent civilians in Kikla City. (video)
17.07.2011. --- Multiple urban areas were bombed simultaneously this morning. Anywhere from 60 to 75 bombs may have been dropped mostly in the areas of Tajura and Seraj, according to eyewitness reports. (video)
23.07.2011. --- The bombing of the factory which makes the pipes for the water system, and the murder of 6 of its employees.
24.07.2011. NATO bombing cattle and poultry project in Torghae city (video).
24. 07.2011. Libya war: NATO Press Briefing, 15 civilians are dead in Tawergha (video).
24.07.2011. ---The bombing of the Hospital at Zliten. Resulting in the murder of a minimum, of 50 civilians many of them children.(video).
25.07.2011. NATO bombed food storage in Zlitan.(video).
25.07.2011. --- 20 civilians were killed by NATO air strikes in Bir al Ghanam. (video)
30.07.2011. --- NATO warplanes also repeatedly bombed a Libyan television station, killing 3 and injuring 15.
02.08.2011. --- Law School In Zlitan (Zliten) (video).
04. 08.2011. --- Woman and two children (video).
07.08.2011. --- NATO bombed today the vegetable market in Tripoli (link).
08.08.2011. --- Libya: NATO MASSACRED 85 CIVILIANS: 33 CHILDREN, 32 WOMEN and 20 MEN (video)...
The persistent on-going bombing of the civilian population in Zliten, Sirte and Tripoli, death toll not yet established. All4Peace & LibyaSOS.
http://libyasos.blogspot.com/2011/11/operation-unified-protector-nato-in.html

5. Further documentary evidence of the crimes.
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000524791925
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49TOmo3CZOU&feature=share
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qXRwBXK34o
 http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=25221
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MbR8FaBwPRw
 http://rt.com/news/interview-libya-nato-intrusion-127/
http://libyasos.blogspot.com/2011/11/operation-unified-protector-nato-in.html
 Drawn up by: Timothy Bancroft Hinchey
Pravda.Ru
Director and Chief Editor Portuguese Version
Sandra Barr, Nada Pejnovic and Tatjana Dimitrijevic
Christopher C. Black, Barrister, Canada

PS the above could be applied to the case of the Human rights violation and crime as well as genocide in Ivory Coast  in which the UN/French troops/ Ouattara' rebels were involved in one way or another.

ARE THE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS WEAPONS AT THE SERVICES OF THE MOST POWERFUL ?

Once again international organizations apply their laws as they wish  or as it suits them, this according to their interests.

AS  MIGHT THE INFORMATION BELOW BE correct, we can not in any way behave in this way, namely performing acts outside the law, even if  we are called ICC, UN etc. ...... because none of these organizations is above the constitution of each member state, as stipulated in the laws governing these organizations. Are we at the dawn of a new international dictatorship? And as though this is done in a magic wand, why the ICC did not  investigated abuses committed by Allassane Dramane Ouattara, Guillaume Soro, Cherif Ousmane and all the other warlords in 2002 in the north of Ivory Coast, given that at the time the government signed the recognition of the jurisdiction of the ICC (for investigation). Should we take it as a double standard?


================ =========== Alert Alert Alert

General mobilization! @ All patriotic resistant, all lover of Peace and Justice  wherever you are,  Mobilize yourselves! ICC  is to send technical mission to Abidjan  on Monday for the transfer GBAGBO! we just have this information, from a confidential source!

 
 
 WHY President Laurent Gbagbo CANNOT BE TRANSFERRED TO THE ICC:

 
Côte d'Ivoire has not ratified the Rome Statute establishing the ICC and it can not do so immediately because of a decision of the Constitutional Council which states that certain provisions of this statute is contrary to our constitution accordance with Article 86. As a result, the ratification will be possible only after revision of the Basic Law, which review may be done by referendum as the relevant constitutional provisions are related to the exercise of presidential term (see section 126 of the Constitution).

However, in the absence of ratification of the Rome Statute which created the ICC,it has no jurisdiction over Ivorian citizens.

Recognition by the Ivorian government of the jurisdiction of the ICC can not take the place of ratification. It just allows to investigate. Indeed, if the Constitutional Council held that the ratification in the current state of our legislation is not constitutionally possible, it is not a statement of recognition that would be. However, the ratification is only allowed by national representation of Parliament. The requirement of ratification as well as being constitutional is also a measure of good governance because of the principle of separation of powers if the signing of an international convention or treaty by the executive would have been enough to involve a State.

 
 
 
RATIFICATION OF THE DECLARATION OF JURISDICTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT

 
 
 
 List of 33 African countries have ratified the Treaty of Rome:

    Burkina Faso, November 30, 1998
    Senegal, February 2, 1999
    Ghana, December 20, 1999
    Mali, 16 August 2000
    Lesotho, September 6, 2000
    Botswana, September 8, 2000
    Sierra Leone, September 15, 2000
    Gabon, September 20, 2000
    South Africa, November 27, 2000
    Nigeria, September 27, 2001
    Central African Republic, October 3, 2001
    Benin, January 22, 2002
    Mauritius, March 5, 2002
    Democratic Republic of Congo, April 11, 2002
    Niger, 11 April 2002
    Uganda, June 14, 2002
    Namibia, June 20, 2002
    Gambia, 28 June 2002
    United Republic of Tanzania, August 20, 2002
    Malawi, 19 September 2002
    Djibouti, November 5, 2002
    Zambia, November 13, 2002
    Guinea, 14 July 2003
    Congo, May 3, 2004
    Burundi, 21 September 2004
    Liberia, September 22, 2004
    Kenya, March 15, 2005
    Comoros, August 18, 2006
    Chad, January 1, 2007
    Madagascar, March 14, 2008
    Seychelles, 10 August 2010
    Tunisia, 22 June 2011
    Cape Verde, October 11, 2011

 
Our local correspondent Clifci

Woodji Leliondegahoulou

HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION IN IVORY COAST: Ivorians “invade” the UN

  HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN IVORY COAST: Ivorians “invade” the UN. – Source Ivorian.Net by Zeka Togui

The UN, through the voice of the Security Council reaffirmed on March 30, about the Ivory Coast that it “strongly condemns all acts of violence against civilians, including women, children, displaced persons and foreign nationals, and other violations of human rights, particularly on disappearances, extrajudicial killings, murder and maiming of children and rape and other forms of sexual violence ” (Resolution 1975 of March 30, 2011 paragraph 5) The policy statements of this kind have always been the hallmark of UN resolutions. In its resolutions on Côte d’Ivoire, the UN has remained true to that types of statements, since its resolution 1464 of February 4, 2003. Present in the declarations, missing in action, the UN has been able to show through the abysmal gap between resolutions and its actions on the field missions. But the question becomes disconcerting when the United Nations is itself deeply involved in what it claims to condemn(acts of violence against civilians, including women, children, displaced persons and foreign nationals, and other violations of human rights, particularly on disappearances, extrajudicial killings, murder and maiming of children and rape and other forms of sexual violence). This has led the Ivory Coast to show their anger loudly against the United Nations on Friday 11 November.

They(Ivorians ) traveled to Geneva the Swiss capital, to do so. To protest against the UN crimes and serious violations of human rights in Côte d’Ivoire, Geneva was indeed the place indicated. It is the city that houses the headquarters of the High Commissioner for Human Rights United Nations. They Came mostly from France and Italy, These Ivorians, and their compatriots in Switzerland, have responded to the appointment of Geneva. It was to denounce and condemn all the crimes which the UN is directly responsible or in which it is involved through the actions of its peacekeepers in Ivory Coast. The event began with a major operation. It is from the Cropette’s park that the protesters went to get to the Place des Nations. Holding placards and banners with images of cruelty in serious violations of human rights in Côte d’Ivoire. The march was marked by a true manifestation of anger expressed by virulent remarks against the UN. A group of teenagers and children supervised by demonstrators Genava has also mark its presence. They chanted “Gbagbo President ! Sarkozy murderer! Free Gbagbo ! ” (click on  video image below )     

Nous sommes en ce moment à Genève en Suisse pour une marche ...

Length: ‎0:42

It was around 2:00 p.m., at the Place des Nations, that occurred intervention from policymakers and Associations. Were present for the occasion a large delegation of the Representation of the FPI(Ivorian Popular Front) in France, Abel Naki and Willyla of the Cri Panaficain, Leontine Topo, President of Women patriots ,of Christine Zékou CODESCI (Defence Committee of the institutions and structures of the Coast Ivory), Zap Krasso and JC Gnawa of COJEP There was of course a representation of COPACI (Current Thought and Action Ivory Coast) led by its President Blaise Pascal Logbo. His party was the main initiator and organizer of this historic event, in collaboration with the associations mentioned above.

Blaise Pascal Logbo and all other officials who spoke were quick to condemn the actions of the UN in Africa in general and in the Ivory Coast in particular. They emphasized the responsibility of the UN for serious violations of human rights in Côte d’Ivoire. They denounced the guilty silence of the UN in dealing with all serious violations of human rights in Côte d’Ivoire. All have not failed to demand the release of all political prisoners under Alassane Ouattara.

Resolution 1975*(initiated and drafted by France a non neutral country in Ivory Coast as her past and action prove therefore illegal according to the UN charter) was passed, it is said, to protect the civilian population. This view has been challenged by the President of COPACI. Resolution 1975 of March 30, 2011 was, he said, “granted the coalition Unicorn - UN peacekeepers- rebels a license to kill . By this permit to kill the peacekeepers themselves raised up as makers of war. “The UN soldiers and the French Licorne have provided logistical and operational support to the rebellion force to carry out the coup of April 11, 2011 against the President Gbagbo. For Blaise Pascal Logbo, “the only democratic solution to a contentious post-election was the recounting not the bombing.”?*(Which any real organisation promoting peace and security would had done, but the UN refused to recount) and bombed ,ke;;ing civilians)

Before the end of the event, the president of COPACI was received on the premises of the High Commissioner for Human Rights United Nations, where he filed a motion.

It should be remembered that by resolution 1479 of May 13, 2003 that the municipality was created (United Nations Mission in Côte d’Ivoire).

Its mission was originally “to facilitate the implementation by the Ivorian parties of the Linas-Marcoussis Agreement.”(a pure mafia deal)

At the request of President Gbagbo, in a message to the UN on 10 November 2003, the UN was willing to get involved in the maintenance of peace in Côte d’Ivoire. It’s With this in mind, that the municipality was converted into UNOCI (United Nations in Côte d’Ivoire).(Now notice it’s all in the details the UN at the instant where it turned from UNMICI to UNOCI is no longer in mission but an occupier entity in Ivory Coast as we can now see the territory in fully occupies by the UN and there would be more to come since they are talking about a concern regarding the security)

But when hostilities broke out in March 2011, the “neutrality”, still proclaimed by the UN, which so far advanced under sheep clothing(under neutrality) ,which no longer suits her. She decided to drop the mask and write her name in letters of blood in the history of Ivorian chaos by giving a war order to its peacekeepers and the French Licorne force, along with the rebellion.

Origial text by Zeka Togui translated and reedited by Patrick Cohen

UN WATCH IVORY COAST: The New World Order Coup in Ivory Coast executed b...

UN WATCH IVORY COAST: The New World Order Coup in Ivory Coast executed b...:

France wanted the war in Ivory Coast. She has all means. The principal is the manipulation of information even before...

The New World Order Coup in Ivory Coast executed by France: Back on misinformation, the lethal weapon of Ouattara

 France wanted the war in Ivory Coast. She has all means. The principal  is the manipulation of information even before the outbreak of the rebellion of September 19, 2002 and especially in the post-election period. Across the board, the French media have made the so-called international community accept much of forfeiture   . But now, the lies of Mr. Ouattara and his supporters are discovered.
At the height of the armed post-election crisis  in Ivory Coast, April 1, 2011,under the nose and the noses of UN peacekeepers stationed in Duékoué, pro-Ouattara armed militias , traditional Dozo hunters and the Armed Forces New Forces renamed Republican Forces of Côte d’Ivoire (FRCI), massacred civilians suspected of being supporters of President Laurent Gbagbo in Western countries. Meanwhile, the French media who escorted the killers in their progress in  Abidjan facilitated by the French army to  were silent. They were busy shaping French and international public opinion , for example with Ms.Sogona Bamba , Communications Advisor of Mr. Alassane Ouattara, by misinformation on a French television channel France 24 spent, that day, on a special edition post-election crisis in Ivory Coast. “Yes they (the pro-Ouattara FRCI) are going down to the South, and I think it’s in self-defense, because you can not have a man who ruled a country, and may agree to allow his followers to burn young people like that! You can not! Today, we can not look at that. (…) We must show what Gbagbo’s men have done, so it’s a self-defense! “Justified Ms. sogona Bamba  on the small screen, while displaying a photo of a young man being burned strong (see Photo 1).
This manipulations from the New World Order’s media in complicite with the UN can been seen in Pallywood
This special edition, entitled “Ivory Coast civil war,” was passed long loop to achieve the objectives. That is, to put the lie to the truth, move the international community and humanitarian organizations on violations of human rights exclusively granted to Laurent Gbagbo and his supporters in Côte d’Ivoire. The rest is history: tracking down the pro-Gbagbo and members of his ethnic group throughout the national territory. Attempted assassination of President Laurent Gbagbo and successful coup d’etat by France supported by the United States of America and the United Nations (UN), April 11, 2011.
Of course, in this four months post-election war  that could have been avoided by recounting the votes in three days, such horrible scenes had to be committed to either side, both sides, and the National Human Rights has condemned in its latest report. But on April 1, 2011, the image of the young man burned alive  shown by sogona Bamba did not come from our country. The picture sogona Bamba presented as an exaction from Laurent Gbagbo supporters against Ivorian of the  northern part of Ivory Coast ,which has also justified the bloody offensive of pro-Ouattara forces supported by the French army and that of the United Nations Operation in Côte d’Ivoire is not a picture of a RDR militant, the party of Alassane Ouattara. It is not the image of an Ivorian from North. The picture exhibited by the communications advisor of the current tenant of the presidential palace by force of arms, was taken May 18, 2008, in South Africa. It shows how the young Ernesto Alfabeto Nhamuave was burned to death during a street demonstration in Johannesburg. On the original photo manipulated by the Ouattara camp, we recognize a security guard in South Africa ready to fly on the rescue of the young man on fire (see photo 2 below).

 Now that the prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo of the International Criminal Court (ICC) is interested in what really happened in Ivory Coast after  the  28 November 2010, we return to the item broadcast on French TV France 24 which had  justify all these attacks against the Ivorian institutions and stalking entire populations suspected of supporting the constitutional legality of the country. This image, which was later often illustrated in newspaper articles favorable to Ouattara could justify the figure of 8000 people massacred that the victors of the war in Ivory Coast are  trying  to dilute at 3,000 people. It is proof that Mr. Ouattara has manipulated information to put the opinion on his side in order to legitimize persecution and killings against members of the ethnic group of his political opponent Laurent Gbagbo and against his family.
It should  be pointed out that Ouattara and his supporters were not at their first destructive attempt . Before the the failed coup of September 18 to 19, 2002 turned into rebellion, the current tenant of the presidential palace in Ivory Coast and its conquistadors had produced “Côte d’Ivoire, identity warzone” of a certain dodgy Benoit Scheuer, to prepare public opinion for war. Before this film, had a rough montage assigned a mass grave to Laurent Gbagbo in Yopougon. But more seriously, Mr. Ouattara and communicators had floated the foul idea that  the 57 bodies of this mass grave were the bodies of “Muslims”. How could they identify the religion of the naked bodies found ? No one knows. The fact is that throughout these ten years that lasted the longest coup in Africa, supporters of Ouattara and some French medias have developed such arguments with a few humanitarian organizations to legitimize the war of recolonisation of Côte d’Ivoire by the New World Order through France, with dramatic consequences that are known of the Ivorian people.
In truth, winning the presidential election of October 2000 organized by the military regime, President Gbagbo signed his death warrant. France has decided to oust the sovereignty defender Laurent Gbagbo by any means. The September 2002 coup failing  , the decision to overthrow the head of state was postponed until the next presidential election, regardless of the outcome of it. It’s the obstacles posed by the rebellion that delayed completion of the war against Gbagbo. With the presidential election in November, France opened its media all forfeitures benefiting to her foal Ouattara. They have been so successful that they have influenced  the international community with misinformation. Which made the inhuman decisions against  Ivorians with a war that caused more than 8,000 dead.
As Alassane Ouattara and his supporters swear by it, so much  the ICC, despite its tarnished reputation  by its records only directed against the weak in favor of the strong of this world, may its open its eyes on these forfeitures in Ivory Coast.
This kink of manipulations from the New World Order’s media in complicite with the UN can been seen in Pallywood

Pallywood – truth in the middle east hollyland, what goes behind the scenes and for the cameras

Now compare the above with the manipulation of the same French medias still in complicity with  the UN in Ivory Coast

As we said it earlier  the post-election war   could have been avoided by recounting the votes in three days . Well that’s exactly what would had been done in any transparent democratically organized election. And even in Afghanistan  as well as in Haiti the votes were recounted after a disputed result but ask yourselves why the UN special representative refuses to recount the votes  ? Well if we go back to the Afghan election we can see clearly that the usual suspects(USA, France, EU, and the UN) were involved in mass election fraud .The UN’s number two official in Afghanistan, Peter Galbraith, has been fired after a clash with head of mission Kai Eide over how to handle fraud in the recent presidential elections.  Galbraith alleges that Eide is covering up massive corruption for reasons of expediency.In one word he was fired because he exposed or refused ti hide Afghanistan election fraud. It should be noted that the UN as well as the so called independent election comity declared the election transparent and democratic. “For a long time after the elections, Kai denied that significant fraud had taken place, even going to the extreme of ordering U.N. staff not to discuss the matter,” just as the Mr Choi in Ivory Coast denied the mass frauds. Galbraith said Eide had suppressed “extensive data” on fraud that the United Nations had collected, not sharing it with Afghan election officials. “I felt we should share it; Kai did not,” he said. Additionally, Galbraith alleges that Eide refused to hand over to the electoral complaints commission massive evidence that their staff had collected about actual incidents of vote fraud. Staff was frustrated that their evidence was going to waste after they put themselves at risk to collect it, he said. The recall of Galbraith would have required the agreement of the Obama administration and has come as a surprise following the earlier demand by Obama’s own envoy to Afghanistan, Richard Holbrooke, that Karzai respect the proper election process.The recounting of the  vote as well as the UN late admittance of fraud proved the opposite. So why the UN involves itself in frauds ? It’s rather clear, however, that in attempting to be “neutral,” Eide and his team have essentially been involved in a fraud.  That, combined with the fact that the Obama administration has apparently decided that they have no choice but to recognize Karzai as the winner of the election, stolen or not, left Galbraith in an untenable position. The USA being the main founder of the UN it becomes therefore a tool in its hands to reach its imperialist new order goals.In Ivory we had the same attitudes from the UN officials acting on behalf of the US and the multinationals  by committing frauds as well as participating  in crimes or covering them. In Haiti the people have to take up the street in order to expose the UN  (who declared the first round democratic and transparent  while  the recounting shows the opposite) frauds. The people of Ivory would not sleep until the presidential vote is recounted no matter how long it would take to get there….We would expose the misinformation and truth would always triumph….

Caesar Etou and Koukougnon Zabril , tranlated and reedited by Patrick Cohen