Would the ICC be forced to reveal who actually won the 2010 election in Ivory Coast ?

 ICC might be forced to reveal who actually won the election 2010 in Ivory Coast

The disputed election results which led to a war is now crystallizing around the case Gbagbo examined before the International Criminal Court (ICC). But curiously, Laurent Gbagbo is not so much the object of attacks that the ICC itself as well as  France the UN and the EU etc. overwhelming Ivorian and worldwide supporters of the legal and legitimate president of Ivory Coast according to the country's constitution,unfairly suspected of crimes against humanity, are  on Twitter and comment  daily hearings ,requesting behind the hashtag # FreeGbagbo his release. They expose  the international justice "biased", which would have condoned abuses by Ouattara clan.

The French  journalist Frédéric Taddeï is also indignant signing on his Newsring an article entitled "Stop the costs." "has it not become urgent to put an end to this travesty of international justice that acts as an additional instrument of domination at the service of  he current powers ?" He wrote. Finally, the Amnesty International report, published on Monday entitled "Ivory Coast- the law of the winners," adds fuel to the fire. "Ivory Coast remains the scene of serious human rights violations against actual or alleged supporters of  President Laurent Gbagbo," can be read as an introduction. 88 pages support these information.
Now for Geraldine Mattioli, director of the division justice to the NGO Human Rights Watch (HRW)  to say that it's a political smokescreen to claim  Ouattara should also appear before the ICC, because it adds nothing to the  Gbagbo defense is not surprising since most of the fakes reports used by Ouattara are from the HWR( founded by George Soros the greatest evangelist of the new world order and open society/market). Notice the ICC linked to the UN very involved on the Ivory Coast(world first producer of Cocoa for Chocolate) election frauds and all the unrest that followed causing more than 3000 officially. The ICC is also supported financially by George Soros friend and partner  Anthony "Choc fingers" Ward the head of Amajero into Chocolate trading. Do you see the combination ? They are on alert because this is clearly an economico-political issue which if it goes as it's ought to will have many heads rollings... So here what the legal legitimate President of Ivory Coast M Laurent Gbagbo  said at the hearing :

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen judges
I followed these debates, I heard a lot of things, some times I found myself in Ivory Coast, but other times  so far away. So the questions  asked were far from what we experienced. And I said why in the modern justice is there entrenched camps.
Because on many issues, both the prosecution and the representative of the victims  as well as yourself you could call me, I could provide with answers that would be information. That you could check but after thin reasoning. I could say a lot about small issues.
For example, when it's said "he(President Gbagbo) signed a paper to deploy the army, ever. I signed a decree that all FDS might be mobilized. But it is a practice that dates back to 1961, which dates from the time when the army was created. The Head of State may in times of trouble, signed a decree. Because the police is the police, then  there's the gendarmerie.
But if these two forces are fully submerged they may call in the army reinforcements. And so for that, the President signed a decree that he gave to the different heads. It is for them to use the army or not to use, it depends on what they think or the situation. So this is practical things like that and small that I could explain.
When the leader of FDS came to tell me ... the situation in Abobo, there are soldiers from IB, I think it's them the invisible commando, so we do not know how it will go ...I said what do we do? He said good sign a decree anyway and then we will keep it, and if we do not need, we do not need it, but if we do need ... So there is a lot of things like that.
And should not you give me siblings  that I do not have.I think we want to be like in Europe, to say the Africans that is how they govern. I do not govern with my family!
I am the Head of State, President of the Republic and my wife is MP , Kadet is not my nephew. The word nephew is a French(English) word. I have nephews who are here in this room. But Kadet is not my nephew. He was Minister for Defence, he was my advisor. I do not govern with my family!
Maybe it happened like that elsewhere in Africa but not in Ivory Coast at the time of Gbagbo.
That is to say, there are little things like that which could have been avoided ... and it prevents us from going immediately to the bottom of the problem.Madam Speaker, my lifeand that, it is not only in Ivory Coast but throughout Africa and throughout France politics, I fought for democracy.
I have asked my lawyers last week, I told them that I wanted to send you all the books I've written about my journey. They told me that it was too late. (...)
We did not know that. So we fought with courage .... But we were convinced that ourselves will not see democracy triumph. But the Berlin Wall collapsed and helped us win the victory of multiparty democracy.
So that's why I just want to say and I will not go further. I would simply say that Madam Prosecutor said something that shocked me somehow.
By saying that we are not here to see who won the election and has not won. But we can not talk, and can not discuss the post-election crisis and do not know how the elections went over.
Who won the election? Because it is he who has not won that sowed disorder/ troubles. I think that's the logic.

So the question is: Who won the elections? And so when I asked I said lets count the votes, it was not a sentence in the air.
You saw yourself available documents to the prosecution on which and the voices of the voters are listed. We have seen that in the only city of Bouaké, they added 100,000 votes to my opponent.
That is the substance of the matter. We were attacked in 2002, I've done my job. That is to say, I have never believed that Ivory Coast would get thing sorted through the war. I never believed it. I always thought we would pull through discussion. Even though I know they are wrong. But to get by, I've always believed in the discussion.
So I traveled throughout Africa. It has made the Lomé negotiations. They Marcoussis Kléber negotiations and meeting . But this I leave that aside ... we've had negotiations Accra 1  ,  Accra 2, Accra 3 under the chairmanship of John Kuffor. We did the negotiations in June 2005, Pretoria Pretoria 1 and 2, under the presidency of Thabo Mbeki.
We all did. We have done everything possible to advance the discussion. Pretoria is where I asked Thabo Mbeki to help me find a legal solution for Alassane to be candidate . Because it poisons the situation. It is in Pretoria in 2005.
We met Thabo Mbeki, Konan Bedie, Ouattara and myself. I asked Ouattara to translate between Thabo Mbeki and me. This is where I said it did not bother me that Ouattara becomes candidate . But as my electorate is also there, so we must ask Thabo Mbeki  to write to all of us in Abidjan after that I can make a decision.

I did not  like Article 48 of the Constitution. It's like Article 16 of the French Constitution, it gives a lot of power. But that day, I took the article 48 of the Constitution and I allowed Konan Bedie and Ouattara to be candidates.
Thus madam this is what I wanted to say.

Our country, our states - and this will be my last point - are fragile. And every time a Head of  Western or European State tells me to make democracy in Africa, I told him we need democracy not because, you say  it, but because we, ourselves,  actually need to build our countries.Mrs. In Ivory Coast look, if we do not use democracy, how do we choose the head of state?
There;s in the the eastern, backed to the Ghanaian border, the Akan  who have a way for them to choose their village leaders or township or their kings. We have in the west power scattered. We have the Islamized north of the Malinke who gather around mosques and alongside them, Senufo who are in sacred groves.

What type election will we take?

So democracy helps us. Because it gets rid of all that and it gives each considered individual  citizen, one vote. That is why I am committed to the fight for democracy.
Especially us who come from low-income families, if there is no democracy, there  we would  never get to higher positions. I think people with whom I was at school, when I was elected president, they were not surprised because they knew my commitment. But they came to greet me, to salute my courage. Because I was not the most supported , I was not the smartest, I was not the richest ...
So we need democracy Madame. But democracy is not only the vote, it's who proclaims the vote. That's also democracy.
When they go to take a night, the chairman of the electoral group (IEC Ed.), who is  led in the electoral headquarters of a candidate, they invite a foreign television, telling him to make a declaration and they film him and diffuse it the next morning. It is not very democratic that's not democracy.
Democracy, is the respect for the texts, starting with the highest standards of law  that is the Constitution.The one who does not respect the Constitution is not democratic.
Madam, it is because I respected the Constitution, that they want bring me here. Well  I'm here, but I'm counting on you.
I trust you because I would like all Africans who support me and are here all the time before the Court, before the prison, who are in their country protesting, walking,  all of these African to understand that the salvation of the African states, is the respect we give Constitutions and laws made thereunder.
Thank you, Madam.

HEM Laurent Gbagbo President of the Republic of Ivory Coast

28 February 2013 at the ICC

Now if we go on the depth of the matter it's obvious that the refusal to recount the disputed election results caused the death of 3000 people officially. It's therefore to cover up this crime that the rhetoric regarding Pr Gbagbo refusal to accept his defeat was relayed by the meanstream medias like parrots. This was so   since the crimes(Ivory Coast in less than 2 years became the 1st country in Africa and the 3rd country in the world where there's more killings since this situation) in Ivory Coast which is still on going involve  the heads of the following entities UN,EU, US, France, UK acting as commercially representatives of the multinationals.

.Isn't strange for a cour accusing a President for refusing to concede his defeat at the election to say through the main prosecutor(Fatou Bensouda ) " We are not here to prove who won the election" ...this demonstrates not only a running away from the reality concerning the actual cause of the post electoral crise resulting in more than 3000 deaths which is the refusal of Mr Ouattara and his sponsors to recount the disputed results as any democratic person would had done.   And Mrs Bensouda statement also reveals that the accusations against Gbagbo regarding his refusal to concede his defeat (which never was since he can prove the contrary but the accusers cannot do so ) has not a single foundation and is baseless.

the deaths were caused by the refusal to recount the disputed election results. What makes more sense or stand water? How  one can recognize a defeat when the evidence demonstrates the opposite and why refuse the supposed winner  refuses a recount to prove his victory rejecting all negotiations and choosing war  instead?
We will always come back to who won the 2010 elections in Ivory Coast ?

 "The Court should be a true work of inquiry and investigation. It should ask whether the elements of the crimes alleged against Gbagbo are there. It is well known that  abuses have been committed in Ivory Coast by Ouattara in the same issue , but this has not been  to do investigated. This is simply because not only he acted on behalf of the so called international community but also the fact being of the IMF(contrary to the official view he's no longer part of this entity but the truth is that he's an agent of IFM) he benefits from the Bretton Woods immunity act protection. So he can kill in all impunity as his militia often say we'' kill you all and nothing would happen.  Defense continues to demonstrate the vision "fragmented" and "incomplete" facts as presented by the Prosecution. But faced with the evidence adduced by the prosecutor, Emmanuel Altit and fellow lawyers are forced to move to a higher gear.

Delegitimizingthe work of the prosecutor

takes long hours, Defense clearly  pointed out all the shortcomings of the investigation, evidence proof. The work is long, tedious, but remarkable. Such a report is not enough documented. Perpetrators can not be identified. Such fact was misinterpreted. Laurent Gbagbo's lawyers have delegitimized the "insiders".
At the stage of confirmation of charges hearing, judges must only ensure that the evidence is strong enough to open a trial. Neither party - Defense and Prosecution -  do not so fully reveal their game But if Gbagbo had to be sued, the trial will far exceed his own accusation. This is France's, UN, US, EU involvement in the conflict that will be under that would be under radars. So that would come back to main point who won the election ?