Saturday, 15 June 2013

THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE ON TRIAL


Photo: CPI : Le procureur a jusqu'au 15 novembre 2013 pour apporter des preuves supplémentaires sur l'affaire Gbagbo. Entretemps, quelqu'un sur lequel une Accusation soutenue par la France, les USA et l'ONU, n'a pas obtenu de preuves suffisantes en un an et demi fait quoi ? La liberté provisoire s'impose. #freegbagbo

Théophile Kouamouo

Gbagbo's case reveals all the shortcoming and inconsistencies in form as well as on the background of the International Criminal Court, seen by its critics as a justice of "winners.

It was a piece of choice. But it turns out  hard to swallow.
It is not an issue of  gastronomy here, but digestion problems  of some international justice. And one that should more accurately represent the International Criminal Court (ICC), a young institution as ten years of existence, designed to take over the Nuremberg and Tokyo .....

In late November 2011, the ICC is offered a piece of exception ... Laurent Gbagbo, 68 years old, a former member of the  Socialist , a friend of Jack Lang and Emmanuelli, historical opponent of Houphouet-Boigny ... ..
Obtaining, with the consent of ..... Alassane OuattaraGbagbo's transfer to the Scheveningen prison on the outskirts of The Hague, the ICC scored a big hit in its short history. It thus gained the ability to judge a head of state.
Launched under the term of office of the Argentinian Louis Moreno Ocampo, chief prosecutor at the ICC, and continued under the auspices of his successor and former deputy, Gambian Fatou Bensouda, the investigations carried out over several months were supposed to confirm the charges initially against Gbagbo. With the key, a unique case since the end of World War II.
But on June 3, those already predicted life imprisonment ..... had disillusioned.

Far from convincing the panel of judges responsible for charge or not of Laurent Gbagbo, , the copy made by the prosecutor Fatou Bensouda and her team copped a very poor "A review." The judges criticized her particularly for the weak and approximation of the investigation, essentially based on "hearsay from anonymous reports of NGOs, UN and newspaper articles." In short, shoddy work, without a "high probative value." as shown in the link bellow :

Moreover, in a room of ordinary justice, Mass was said, and Gbagbo went to the affection of his family, his wife Simone, and his son Michel, who, moreover, are still languishing in internment camps in Ivory Coast.
But, as denounced by or to the contrary congratulate opponents or critics of the ICC, it is not an ordinary institution. "All at once a legal body with unique powers but also a political construction" says lawyer Philippe Currat, Secretary General of the International Criminal Bar in Geneva.
As a result, Gbagbo remains in prison and Fatou Bensouda has a "catch-up session," according to the ironic expression of Bernard Houdin, special adviser to the incarcerated President. Houdin which obviously does not deprive  to suspect the invisible arbitration of great powers who have worked in the fall of Gbagbo, France, the United States and their subjects.



By Alain Léauthier

Link  and extra comments added by UN Watch Ivory Coast:
The criticism of the Danish Judge member of 
the ICTY against the international Courts 
added to all the above, are the signs that  
alarm bells of the urgent action to tackle 
these crimes.It must be said plainly, that the 
speaking out of the judge Fréderik Harhoff in 
the Danish media on 12 June will certainty 
make waves within the governing bodies of 
international courts(including the ICC) or 
within the UN that created them.The Dane  
F.Harhoff is an expert in International Law 
and Judge at the International Tribunal for 
Yugoslavia (icty.) He did not wear gloves to 
criticise with unusual virulence practices that 
take place in the court and therefore all 
special courts set up by the UN. He noted 
that these courts are not neutral and obey 
the orders of the great powers, the USA in particular but in 
order to to divert our attention from all the EU countries 
including Denmark his country which directly involved 
in these acts he blamed Israel which he added as great power influencing the international courts. Now contrary to 
most of EU and the USA Israel is very often on trial in before 
these courts while none of these 
countries would never be imagined there on 
trial ....They can only  be judges, or 
prosecutors  in these courts.He went further 
to directly accuse the president of icty the 
AmericainThéodore Meron which would 
exerce pressure on his staff  not to
condemn the Yugoslav, Serbian and 
Croatian officers yet convicted of crimes against humanity . 
Unable to accept "massive pressures and diligent" great powers but also and especially the gulls of suspicion in these 
courts F.Harhoff sent a "confidential" letter to the President 
of icty with copies to 56 other officials including 
lawyers.Harhoff certainly  focused his criticism more on icty 
but they have the advantage of being 
effective for all other courts, including the 
ICC. Assuredly, those who derive a large 
dividend of this output of the Danish judge, are the African    
leaders, the ones who recently launched pulls bundled 
against the ICC, accusing it of practicing a kind of racism 
in its fonctionnement. At the origin of all of 
this awakening, the case of Laurent Gbagbo



No comments:

Post a Comment