After the dissipated smoke (from the stuffed elephant cooking )

 
As demontrated few days ago the conspiracy to exterminate the real people of Ivory Coast is not a theory nor a fiction but a reality 
http://unwatchivorycoast.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/lets-face-re-ality-no-w-more-than-2.html                 . And           http://unwatchivorycoast.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/annihilation-by-starvatio.html       .           Now that the heat has cooled down on the Ivorian situation now the smoke screen has dissipated we can see clearly what actually happened and still happening. As shown on the article below by "the Permanent Revolution":

Ivory Coast: American NGO International Watch explains technically why Gbagbo won the election November 28, 2010!Perhaps, as "the Permanent Revolution", you have known and therefore could not pay soon enough attention to the immense work done by this organization, which is probably wanted to be discreet during the 2010 election in Côte d'Ivoire .But since the revelations  in Médiapart by a blogger, "Permanent Revolution" happening constantly review the analyzes published by the NGO. Today, we are pleased to share with you that further analysis short, precise and very relevant that reveals how and why President Gbagbo won the elections on 28 November 2010."Publications of November 8, 2010 - www.interwatch.org / publicationsThe results of the elections in Côte d'Ivoire given by the IEC in the 1st round are: Gbagbo 1,750,000 votes, 1,450,000 Ado voice Bédié 1,150,000 votes. To pass the 50% mark Gbagbo needed Bédié 425,000 votes, while ADO  needed 725,000.Bédié Voters  majority from Akan group attached to the monarchical and land ownership, a dim one eye Ado perceived as the candidate of the foreigners and to distribute the Ivorian nationality to foreigners so that they would benefit from same property rights in rural areas as stipulated in the  rural land code(as eligible to Ivorian only).Therefore it will be easier for Gbagbo, defender of national sovereignty, to get his 425,000 votes of Bedie electors  than ADO to gather 725,000 voicedespite Bedie call  to do so. Except surprise, the battle will not be easy to erase the image of Ado  as candidate from abroad after the error of Dakar. 'Manifestations of this analysis at the Second round of the elections by International WatchThe 725 000 votes needed by Mr. Ouattara represent the electorate of Mr Bedie, carry a rate of 63%  voices. However, the 725 000 votes represent 12.66% of the 5,725,721 registered voters at the national level.Thus What this figure of 12.66% involved?First, it puts Ouattara in the requirement to obtain a reporting of voice without mechanical dispersion, from Bedie .Second, it  would have to make compulsory the same turnout(83%) as in the first round of the elections .Third, if in the  second round, there is a low turnout(les than 83%) to vote  preventing Ouattara to reach 12.66%  of the voice from any of  Bedie or RHDP  it is that he has lost the elections.But more importantly, President Gbagbo had less need of reporting voice  than abstention from Bedie supporters .What does this mean in practice? Mathematically, more there are  abstentions in participation, the higher the rate of 38.04% obtained by President Gbagbo in the first round mechanically increases  at the second roundHowever, before the beginning of the Franco-UN electoral fraud, voter turnout unanimously displayed in the second round was 70% in contrast to the First Round where there was 83% participation rate. That is to say, from the First Round, 13% of voters not having their candidates in the race have not been to vote and among these, there are at least 95% of which are  Bedie voters other RHDP  candidates scoring less than 70,000 voters in all cumulative scores.Consequences:The prognosis of the NGO International Watch continues. Indeed, with 13% abstention rate compared to the 83% participation of the firsr round is 751 983 Baoulé and other Akans who abstained from voting for whom they call "Mossi"(from Burkina Faso the real nationality of Ouattara as shown on his IFM cv).Thus, they allowed Laurent Gbagbo to win the elections. Indeed, by deducting 751,983 Abstentions to 4,843,445  Voters in the first round, it is 4,091,461 voting in Second Round. Assuming that President Gbagbo retains its  1,756,504 of the first round, the rate of 38.04%  in the First Round is 42.93% at the Second Round . It is then 7.07%  of the first round which is 324 431 voters plus one vote to win the election, which should give 1,756,504 + 324 431 + 1 = 2 080 936 votes to win the election.However, despite the unwavering harm and massive fraud, Youssouf Bakayoko(the chaiman of the IEC) himself announced that Laurent Gbagbo received 2,107,055 votes in the Second Round. This is very clear. Gbagbo needed 2,080,936 votes to win the election. He won according to them, 2,107,055 votes or 26,119 votes more than he needed. Make the conclusion yourself.This is why "the Permanent Revolution" thinks now, more than ever, for the truth, particular attention should be paid to data published by the International NGO Watch.

The cooking of the stuffed Elephant (a new French speciality with an international touch UN, US. EU etc) has produced a very thick smoke but with the time passing all has dissipated and we can see how has been cooked in Ivory Coast.